1. As I have already explained, I never deflect.

People “deflect” when they don’t want to answer a question that hits at the heart of what they’re talking against. In this case there was no need to deflect anything about what Obama said!

  1. Thanks.

  2. Yes it does. You accuse me of deflection I explain what deflection really is. I tried to explain it very simply.

  3. No, it was not a deflection, because I have no need to deflect anything. Let me repeat: this thread discusses Obama talking about taxes and him saying that he’d be willing to pay more in taxes.

If someone had provided a link that proved that in the past Obama had whined about having to pay more in taxes, then the necessity to deflect and ignore that inconvenient fact would be seized upon by people who do deflect, rather than those who face facts - even inconvenient ones, head on.

I was giving an example of what is and is not deflection.

  1. Are we talking about the eye of the needle here??? (That’s a rhetorical question - don’t answer it!)

Anything I said was an example of what is and what is not deflection. For an in-depth discussion of religion, yeah, that should be in the religion folder.

And I think there’s nothing more to be said on anything in this thread so I’m done.

We’ll cross swords in others, I’m sure. :grinning: