Leave it to you, Jezcoe, to once again intentionally engage in obfuscation by generalization. Now, let us get to some specifics.
Why have you avoided acknowledging if you support enforcement of our immigration’s public charge law 8 u.s.c. § 1182(a)(4?
“Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is excludable.”
Why have you avoided acknowledging if you support the vetting of potential immigrants based upon the following categories? (1) poverty-stricken and a likely public charge (2) poorly educated (3) low skilled (4) diseased (5) disabled (6) criminal
Is it not in the best interests of the United States and her citizens to vet potential immigrants based upon the above listed categories?
Tell us Jezcoe, has uncontrolled immigration led to a situation where public schools, emergency care rooms and public housing, all meant for our citizens, are overburdened with foreign nationals, and our citizens and their children are paying the price?
Additionally, Jezcoe, by your above comments, it appears that you embrace taxing American citizens to finance the economic and social needs of illegal entrant foreign nationals, and their children. Having compassion for foreign nationals wanting a “better life”, as you put it, is a noble cause, but it should not encourage you to support the use of government force to wreck the lives of American citizens. If your cause is just, you would support CHARITABLE GIVING and not tax tyranny, or making American citizens taxed slaves to support your cause.
On the other hand, it is understandable why AOC, who is a card carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America, detests charitable giving as opposed to tax tyranny.
JWK
If the Chinese Communist Party leadership promised to forgive todays woke generation’s student loans, would they vote for a Communist Party Leadership?