Some obscure titles of Dr Suess that had some pretty racist depictions were taken out of publication by the publisher and the copyright owner. That’s not “canceled “.
Utah is the number one porn consuming state. I guess this is one way to attempt to lessen that title.
1 Like
Snow96
22
Governor signs it . . . nothing happens. 5 additional states passage of similar legislation for the law to take effect. Won’t happen.
Small government conservatism
1 Like
WuWei
24
C) That dumbass swore an oath to follow the Constitution.
This idea that “we can stop it” needs to change to them not submitting the crap in the first place.
conan
25
Oh now libs have a problem with censorship…too funny.
2 Likes
enki
27
State mandated? Everyone should have a problem with that.
5 Likes
If the phones aren’t the problem, why is the law targeted at the phones?
Lol Clipper chip part XIV.
1 Like
Care to comment on the OP?
1 Like
conan
31
Doesn’t matter. Its been clear libs believe in censorship.
conan
32
What about it…I see a lib bitching about someone censorship while remain silent of supportive of censorship.
I didn’t realize the governer of Utah was a lib.
1 Like
enki
34
Lol. Support state mandated censorship to stick it to the libs.
Have fun!
1 Like
JayJay
35
It’s precisely like Dr. Seuss.
If you’re offended by it, I suggest you put your emotions in check and suck it up.
1 Like
JayJay
36
If I understand the bill correctly, this is the textbook definition of censorship…government mandating what adults may have on their phones.
No government signed a law telling the owners of the rights to Dr. Seuss to stop publishing those six books.
If they had done so, I would have been right there fighting it.
1 Like
conan
37
OP and libs here are complaining/bitching.
conan
38
Did I say I support it? I’m point out libs hypocrisy.
You either believe in first Amendment rights or you don’t. There is no shade of gray so justify your hypocrisy.
1 Like
conan
39
Again…justifying one own hypocrisy.
1 Like