November 2020 - Election Month

[WorldWatcher]

@NebraskaFootball

Honestly, at my age, I long for the day. I only keep doing this work now to keep myself occupied. I’ve been forging ballots for so many years that it is almost a hobby for me. But I wouldn’t mind taking up something less rigorous on the hands and wrists. My arthritis acts up too often now. I’d love to pass the torch of stealing elections over to the younger generation and then spend my time watching old re-runs and fishing down at the lake house.

Not to fear comrade, you have done your part. The children of the motherland will sing your praises and you will receive a star on the wall for your efforts.

Dasvidaniya. We will speak of this again later.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

[NebraskaFootball]

@WorldWatcher

@NebraskaFootball

Honestly, at my age, I long for the day. I only keep doing this work now to keep myself occupied. I’ve been forging ballots for so many years that it is almost a hobby for me. But I wouldn’t mind taking up something less rigorous on the hands and wrists. My arthritis acts up too often now. I’d love to pass the torch of stealing elections over to the younger generation and then spend my time watching old re-runs and fishing down at the lake house.

Not to fear comrade, you have done your part. The children of the motherland will sing your praises and you will receive a star on the wall for your efforts.

Dasvidaniya. We will speak of this again later.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

Dasvidaniya

[AZslim]

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

[AZslim]

@bigtwnvin

Pennsylvania Court: Ballots Received Three Days After Election Must Be Counted – DV Journal
Am I reading this wrong then?

I think so. A vote can be postmarked by election day and not delivered to where it is counted until later.

[RTchoke]

@AZslim

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

However:

In an even more extreme move, the court said that ballots without a postmark or proof of mailing must also be counted, unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows they were mailed after Election Day.

[AZslim]

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

However:

In an even more extreme move, the court said that ballots without a postmark or proof of mailing must also be counted, unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows they were mailed after Election Day.

I"m OK with not allowing them if they don’t have a postmark.

[RTchoke]

@AZslim

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

However:

In an even more extreme move, the court said that ballots without a postmark or proof of mailing must also be counted, unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows they were mailed after Election Day.

I"m OK with not allowing them if they don’t have a postmark.

But they will allow them. That is the concern I believe.

[AZslim]

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

However:

In an even more extreme move, the court said that ballots without a postmark or proof of mailing must also be counted, unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows they were mailed after Election Day.

I"m OK with not allowing them if they don’t have a postmark.

But they will allow them. That is the concern I believe.

I’m OK with that as well. There can’t be that many that missed a postmark. Separate them to see if anything is weird.

[thinkingman]

@AZslim

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@RTchoke

@AZslim

@bigtwnvin

So you are asserting a vote in ballot postmarked after Nov 3rd will be disqualified?

Yes. As far as I can tell the extensions are for the receipt of ballots the ARE postmarked by the 3rd. Nobody is asking for ballots to be counted postmarked AFTER election day to count.

However:

In an even more extreme move, the court said that ballots without a postmark or proof of mailing must also be counted, unless a “preponderance of the evidence” shows they were mailed after Election Day.

I"m OK with not allowing them if they don’t have a postmark.

But they will allow them. That is the concern I believe.

I’m OK with that as well. There can’t be that many that missed a postmark.

it opens up the potential for ballots to keep being “found” tying up decisions, causing chaos

if theyre not in by 4th (give them one day) and not filled out right, tossed

regardless of postmark.

[FlameHeart]

[quote=“WorldWatcher, post:192, topic:235464, full:true”]

@NebraskaFootball

@thinkingman

@NebraskaFootball

@thinkingman

figured this was coming

Democrats Hand Out Extra Ballots To Trick-Or-Treaters | Babylon Bee
[/quote]

I’m passing out full sized Snickers, but only to the kids who fill out the ballot the right way, there in front of me, and then give it back to me so I can turn it in for them. Those who don’t comply get a 4 year old Jolly Rancher that had melted previously, and then re-congealed.

as long as you have 10,000 of them sitting in the trunk waiting to be “found” 2 days after election day youre set

I have way more than 10,000. And combined with my cohorts it is probably upwards of 10,000,000!!!

What’s your rate?

I’m mean I love Biden, he will save us from the demon spawn that is Trump, but come on – I’ve got retirement to think about.

Currently I’m getting $1.57 per ballot that I can forge. I figure after tomorrow night and the kids I ought to be able to bank a little over $2,500,000 even after subtracting the purchase price of candy.

If I make goal I can retire early.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

Hm…do I see a Capitalist solution mentioned by a guy who likes Biden? Tell me it ain’t so!

[thinkingman]

heres a good article discussing many of the ballot shenanigans going on out there

This Week in Ballot Shenanigans: 'Disgrace to Democracy' Edition!

“The Court ruled that Pennsylvania’s rewritten election laws could extend voting, eliminate postmarks, and forbid signature-matching…”

in 2016 trump won PA with what, 45,000 votes or so. already some 40,000 ballots are mia.

wonder when they’ll actually be able to call PA…(if it first goes red of course. if it goes blue they call it within 1 plank time)

[thinkingman]

Folks! Look! Here’s the deal!

another state plagued by ballot issues

wonder how long till they’ll be able to call texas…

heard it’s going blue!

CBS Texas - Breaking Local News, First Alert Weather & I-Team Investigations

[bigtwnvin]

“Preponderance of evidence”. In other words “the postmark date is irrelevant”.

[thinkingman]

oh my…

it’s almost like theres a whole political party that depends on chaos to win…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elections-2020/millions-of-mail-in-ballots-at-risk-in-battleground-states/ar-BB1azk5n?li=BBnb7Kz

[thinkingman]

wow

starting to wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes

Democrats colluding with CIA to launch intelligence operation that ALTERS...

“It seems that Trump’s people are already aware that Dems are working to fraudulently steal this election by altering votes in Pennsylvania, and they’re trying to stop it.“

[TommyLucchese]

Yeah this seems believable.

[JayJay]

@thinkingman

wow

starting to wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes

Democrats colluding with CIA to launch intelligence operation that ALTERS voting machine results: Report

“It seems that Trump’s people are already aware that Dems are working to fraudulently steal this election by altering votes in Pennsylvania, and they’re trying to stop it.“

Let me guess- you don’t actually have an opinion on this…you’re just “throwing it out there for discussion”.

[NebraskaFootball]

@thinkingman

starting to wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes

How deep do you believe it goes?

Do you believe the article you linked?

What about this article made you interested enough to share with us here?

[thinkingman]

@JayJay

@thinkingman

wow

starting to wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes

Democrats colluding with CIA to launch intelligence operation that ALTERS voting machine results: Report

“It seems that Trump’s people are already aware that Dems are working to fraudulently steal this election by altering votes in Pennsylvania, and they’re trying to stop it.“

Let me guess- you don’t actually have an opinion on this…you’re just “throwing it out there for discussion”.

for discussion

i see youre out

[JayJay]

@thinkingman

@JayJay

@thinkingman

wow

starting to wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes

Democrats colluding with CIA to launch intelligence operation that ALTERS voting machine results: Report

“It seems that Trump’s people are already aware that Dems are working to fraudulently steal this election by altering votes in Pennsylvania, and they’re trying to stop it.“

Let me guess- you don’t actually have an opinion on this…you’re just “throwing it out there for discussion”.

for discussion

i see youre out

Yep- I’m sure that’s all you’re doing.