North Korea agrees to denuclearize

[LucyLou]

@Cratic3947

Has NK been shooting missile over Japan lately?.. So, it just your poor memory that make you think that…

So no denuclearization in sight?

[Cratic3947]

I’m starting to feel sorry for Trump haters…

[Cratic3947]

@LucyLou

@Cratic3947

Has NK been shooting missile over Japan lately?.. So, it just your poor memory that make you think that…

So no denuclearization in sight?

Actually, they signed an agreement… So, it’s a start.

[mobiusptc]

Peter Baker

[Cratic3947]

@mobiusptc

https://twitter.com/peterbakernyt/status/1006956678674296832?s=19

Yes, just another dem pretending to be a reporter…

[NebraskaFootball]

@Cratic3947

OK, You define “remove”…LMAO!

That makes no sense. You were shocked that someone felt that in context of the agreement with NK that denuclearization needed to be defined. And when asked to define it yourself, you give us the most simpleton excuse of an answer imaginable. Unsurprising really.

These issues and affairs are well above your level of comprehension. The same is true for Trump. Neither of you can articulate what a denuclearized peninsula looks like in terms of our perspective, the perspective of NK, how the two differing perspectives can be reconciled, and further what our allies and enemies alike that would be affected by this move would view this definition to be.

All we get from you is, “Ok, there are nukes there now, and you remove them.” And “define remove.”

[MoleUK]

@NebraskaFootball

That makes no sense. You were shocked that someone felt that in context of the agreement with NK that denuclearization needed to be defined. And when asked to define it yourself, you give us the most simpleton excuse of an answer imaginable. Unsurprising really.

These issues and affairs are well above your level of comprehension. The same is true for Trump. Neither of you can articulate what a denuclearized peninsula looks like in terms of our perspective, the perspective of NK, how the two differing perspectives can be reconciled, and further what our allies and enemies alike that would be affected by this move would view this definition to be.

All we get from you is, “Ok, there are nukes there now, and you remove them.” And “define remove.”

Historically, N.Korea has defined the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula as the removal of all US nukes from the region.

[NebraskaFootball]

@MoleUK

Historically, N.Korea has defined the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula as the removal of all US nukes from the region.

Exactly. And with China and Russia both having a stake, and especially with Xi having Kim’s ear, it will also likely entail a full removal of US forces, or at minimum a substantial draw-down, from the South as well.

[JayJay]

You’re missing the simpleton equation…that will be lapped up by Trump supporters.

Being against Trump’s approach = wanting the NK’s to have nukes.

[Cratic3947]

@NebraskaFootball

@Cratic3947

OK, You define “remove”…LMAO!

That makes no sense. You were shocked that someone felt that in context of the agreement with NK that denuclearization needed to be defined. And when asked to define it yourself, you give us the most simpleton excuse of an answer imaginable. Unsurprising really.

These issues and affairs are well above your level of comprehension. The same is true for Trump. Neither of you can articulate what a denuclearized peninsula looks like in terms of our perspective, the perspective of NK, how the two differing perspectives can be reconciled, and further what our allies and enemies alike that would be affected by this move would view this definition to be.

All we get from you is, “Ok, there are nukes there now, and you remove them.” And “define remove.”

The nukes are either removed or they are not. Not sure why you leftists find that so confusing. I’m sure Trump will have a better inspection clause than Obama did with Iran. But feel free to freak out until we see what’s signed…lol…

[SottoVoce]

@Illegal_Alien

Did you miss where Zantax said the personally he feels That Trump should be impeached if he is using the Office for Personal gain in this situation?
I agree with it as well.
Trump shouldn’t be using it for personal gain,

But i do have a question for you:
Lets say that part of the deal for NK was to get a Trump Property and they will DeNuclearize and they actually do.
Would you be opposed to that just because Trump possibly making some money?

For the first part, he only said that after my first two reaponses.

For the second part, yes I would be opposed. Not because it’s Trump making money. I don’t care who it is making money. Place any politician’s name in there. Making money while in office, because of your office, is morally wrong (in my opinion) and expressly prohibited by the Constitution.

[SottoVoce]

@Cratic3947

@LucyLou

@Cratic3947

Has NK been shooting missile over Japan lately?.. So, it just your poor memory that make you think that…

So no denuclearization in sight?

Actually, they signed an agreement… So, it’s a start.

A non-binding document with no specifics as to denuclearization or any other concrete plans.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Cratic3947

The nukes are either removed or they are not.

You don’t even know what this means. And it is the most basic of basics regarding this situation.

@JayJay

You’re missing the simpleton equation…that will be lapped up by Trump supporters.

Being against Trump’s approach = wanting the NK’s to have nukes.

Cratic is proving this true in spades.

[Cratic3947]

@NebraskaFootball

@Cratic3947

The nukes are either removed or they are not.

You don’t even know what this means. And it is the most basic of basics regarding this situation.

@JayJay

You’re missing the simpleton equation…that will be lapped up by Trump supporters.

Being against Trump’s approach = wanting the NK’s to have nukes.

Cratic is proving this true in spades.

This may help…

Re·move
rəˈmo͞ov/Submit
verb
1.
take (something) away or off from the position occupied.
“Customs officials removed documents from the premises”
2.
eliminate or get rid of.
“the iron can be removed by filtration”
noun
1.
a degree of remoteness or separation.
“at this remove, the whole incident seems insane”

[NebraskaFootball]

@Cratic3947

This may help…

Re·move
rəˈmo͞ov/Submit
verb
1.
take (something) away or off from the position occupied.
“Customs officials removed documents from the premises”
2.
eliminate or get rid of.
“the iron can be removed by filtration”
noun
1.
a degree of remoteness or separation.
“at this remove, the whole incident seems insane”

As stated, and you continue to prove, the most simpleton of the most simpleton possible explanations.

You don’t even see what you’re doing here.

[Cratic3947]

@NebraskaFootball

@Cratic3947

This may help…

Re·move
rəˈmo͞ov/Submit
verb
1.
take (something) away or off from the position occupied.
“Customs officials removed documents from the premises”
2.
eliminate or get rid of.
“the iron can be removed by filtration”
noun
1.
a degree of remoteness or separation.
“at this remove, the whole incident seems insane”

As stated, and you continue to prove, the most simpleton of the most simpleton possible explanations.

You don’t even see what you’re doing here.

Because the definition if remove is pretty simple. I’m being rational.

[Cratic3947]

@Cratic3947

@NebraskaFootball

@Cratic3947

This may help…

Re·move
rəˈmo͞ov/Submit
verb
1.
take (something) away or off from the position occupied.
“Customs officials removed documents from the premises”
2.
eliminate or get rid of.
“the iron can be removed by filtration”
noun
1.
a degree of remoteness or separation.
“at this remove, the whole incident seems insane”

As stated, and you continue to prove, the most simpleton of the most simpleton possible explanations.

You don’t even see what you’re doing here.

Because the definition if remove is pretty simple. I’m being rational.

Edit = …of remove is pretty simple…

[NebraskaFootball]

@Cratic3947

Because the definition if remove is pretty simple. I’m being rational.

Yep. Simple.

Billy-Bob will just load up the “nukes” on his trailer and cart 'em back to the ol US of A. Bam, nukes removed. Simple.

[LucyLou]

Trump knows there are simpletons born every minute and he knows how to sucker them.

[Cratic3947]

@NebraskaFootball

@Cratic3947

Because the definition if remove is pretty simple. I’m being rational.

Yep. Simple.

Billy-Bob will just load up the “nukes” on his trailer and cart 'em back to the ol US of A. Bam, nukes removed. Simple.

Pretty close… Kind of like when Libya gave up their wmd’s to Bush. Before Obama killed Gaddaffi for no reason.