No-fly lists based on vaccination status?

[Bill.in.PA]

A no fly list for women who refuse to have an abortion would be fine?
Sounds like a news story from China.

[fallenturtle]

@Bill.in.PA

A no fly list for women who refuse to have an abortion would be fine?
Sounds like a news story from China.

Pregnancy isn’t contagious either.

[Guntsu]

@Sknyluv

Already political. A lot of conservatives took the side of COVID when liberals took the other side.

Conservatives have been conditioned to dislike anything perceived to be associated with “lib” even things they have historically supported…AM radio thinking

[biggestal99]

@Bill.in.PA

I see no medical justification for a no-fly list based on vaccination status.

You are a layman with an agenda.

Of course you don’t see the reason.

Allan

[Bill.in.PA]

Private industry that is coerced by the government is a standard tool of oppression by fascist dictatorships.

If public health were the only concern, then we could see separate sections for vaccinated and unvaccinated like we had for smoking and non-smoking.

The main risk I see is that symptomless vaccinated persons may give the disease to the unvaccinated. The danger of an unvaccinated person giving the disease to a vaccinated is trivial.

[Jezcoe]

@Bill.in.PA

If public health were the only concern, then we could see separate sections for vaccinated and unvaccinated like we had for smoking and non-smoking.

You can’t smoke on a plane anymore.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

Saying that the “stick” approach in the “carrot and stick” analogy needs to be used does not mean “bullying”

It means that the positive incentives have failed to achieve goals so negative incentives need to be implemented.

You do realize they hit the burro with the stick, right? Like literally.

[conan]

It’s the direction you guys are heading.

[Guntsu]

Airlines are libs?

[RayStark]

@Jezcoe

@Bill.in.PA

If public health were the only concern, then we could see separate sections for vaccinated and unvaccinated like we had for smoking and non-smoking.

You can’t smoke on a plane anymore.

Hence the usage of the past tense “had”.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

Saying that the “stick” approach in the “carrot and stick” analogy needs to be used does not mean “bullying”

It means that the positive incentives have failed to achieve goals so negative incentives need to be implemented.

You do realize they hit the burro with the stick, right? Like literally.

Bullying Burros.

[Jezcoe]

@RayStark

@Jezcoe

@Bill.in.PA

If public health were the only concern, then we could see separate sections for vaccinated and unvaccinated like we had for smoking and non-smoking.

You can’t smoke on a plane anymore.

Hence the usage of the past tense “had”.

And then eliminated.

Tyranny.

[Bill.in.PA]

Smoke does not abide by the 6-foot rule.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

I hate those people. I really do. It is dumb and highly priviledged way to live.

Embrace the hate!

[Guntsu]

The only laws being passed against business are by so called conservatives.

The state forcing private business to not enforce preventative measures as they see fit and cons cheer

They love their flavor of authoritarianism

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

I hate those people. I really do. It is dumb and highly priviledged way to live.

Embrace the hate!

Hate on priviledged liberals who feel like they are special because of some vapid ideology?.. yeah… I have no problem with that.

[Oldandtired]

Maybe if the left were not so power hungry that they used the virus as a way to get elected people would not be resisting taking the vaccination. Maybe if biden and harris had not been so stupid as say they would not take the vaccination more people would be getting vaccinated. Maybe if the government had not spent years lying more people would believe the liars in DC. Maybe is the experts on the virus had not lied so much more people would be getting the vaccination.

[WuWei]

I love this.

What we are witnessing is unpersoning for non-compliance. A shunning. A shaming.

The rationalizations will keep coming. You’re wasting your time with the analogies.

They are trying to set a new standard for acceptable behavior and who determines it. The state decides who is worthy of what, obviously.

This “malignant individualism” must be destroyed. Individuals don’t have rights. They have privileges granted by the state. The whole concept of liberalism must be erased so the diamond that is the state can be uncovered.

You think it’s an accident they keep saying things like “No right is absolute” and pointing to previous violations as proof? “We’re already violating your rights, which means we can violate them more!”

The state is the divine idea as it exists on earth. The state will be perfected.

…the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the state.

I think it can only end one way.

[Guntsu]

The state is mandating this?

[WuWei]

@Guntsu

The state is mandating this?

Of course.