Nj gym opening despite lockdown order

[STODR]

@AngraMainyu

Because drunk drivers are a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance. Opening up everything is a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance.
I’m sorry, is disease vector* too harsh? You have no right to be a biological weapon. Better?

Why you making ■■■■ up? I never mentioned drunk driving. Oh I know why a potential deadly activity that is perfectly legal completely destroys your arguement. DRIVING is dangerous, you have no right to be a 2000 pound steel vector potentially killing people. You don’t have to drive. take a bus, train, taxi, uber or just stay and cower at home.

[AngraMainyu]

I got a notification that my post was flagged, the one you responded to.

[Samson_Corwell]

@AngraMainyu

I got a notification that my post was flagged, the one you responded to.

I realized it was the one thrown down the memory hole after I posted that question.

[AngraMainyu]

I literally don’t care if you mentioned drunk driving or not. You walked right into it.

[Samson_Corwell]

@AngraMainyu

I literally don’t care if you mentioned drunk driving or not. You walked right into it.

Or drove into it. His pick.

[Samson_Corwell]

@STODR

@AngraMainyu

Because drunk drivers are a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance. Opening up everything is a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance.
I’m sorry, is disease vector* too harsh? You have no right to be a biological weapon. Better?

Why you making ■■■■ up? I never mentioned drunk driving. Oh I know why a potential deadly activity that is perfectly legal completely destroys your arguement. DRIVING is dangerous, you have no right to be a 2000 pound steel vector potentially killing people. You don’t have to drive. take a bus, train, taxi, uber or just stay and cower at home.

I want to heart this post only for “2000 pound steel vector”.

[STODR]

@AngraMainyu

I literally don’t care if you mentioned drunk driving or not. You walked right into it.

lol, says the person who tried to change the subject to an illegal activity when their hypocrisy was showing like a neon sign.

[Samson_Corwell]

@STODR

@AngraMainyu

I literally don’t care if you mentioned drunk driving or not. You walked right into it.

lol, says the person who tried to change the subject to an illegal activity when their hypocrisy was showing like a neon sign.

Drunk driving isn’t a transmissible and evolving threat like a pathogen.

[STODR]

@Samson_Corwell

@STODR

@AngraMainyu

I literally don’t care if you mentioned drunk driving or not. You walked right into it.

lol, says the person who tried to change the subject to an illegal activity when their hypocrisy was showing like a neon sign.

Drunk driving isn’t a transmissible and evolving threat like a pathogen.

Who mentioned drunk driving? Driving can not be a threat? Who says it has to be a transmissible threat to take away your rights?

[AngraMainyu]

You know what? I will address that silly argument. 38,000 people lost their lives in auto-accidents in the year 2019. 90,000+ since March due to COVID. IMAGINE if that many people were dying in car wrecks.

[Auto129]

@Rodeo

People who were operating businesses that are now and always have sold products legally,

Oops. You tripped. $1000 ticket says otherwise.

Hopefully they’ll get another one tommorow if they keep trying to illegally hustle with no regards to the safety of their community.

[RTchoke]

@Auto129

@Rodeo

People who were operating businesses that are now and always have sold products legally,

Oops. You tripped. $1000 ticket says otherwise.

Hopefully they’ll get another one tommorow if they keep trying to illegally hustle with no regards to the safety of their community.

Only because governors have picked winners and losers and apparently the virus can tell the difference if you are in Wal-mart or Joe’s Gym.

[Rodeo]

@Auto129

Oops. You tripped. $1000 ticket says otherwise.

Hopefully they’ll get another one tommorow if they keep trying to illegally hustle with no regards to the safety of their community.

Maybe I’ll go find his GoFundMe page and help him pay it.

The ticket he may or may not have gotten today is about 10000 miles from comparing hard working reputable small business owners to drug dealers. If you want to play that game have fun playing with yourself, I’m not going to waste my time while you pretend you’re making a point. I learned a long time ago there are people on forums like this who just love thinking they are cool. Here’s a hint, comparing good decent honest people to drug dealers is about as low as it gets.

[STODR]

Maybe sell everclear as mouth wash to keep the droplets clean.

[AngraMainyu]

Alright, that one made me chuckle.

[Rodeo]

@RTchoke

Only because governors have picked winners and losers and apparently the virus can tell the difference if you are in Wal-mart or Joe’s Gym.

This damn virus is brilliant isn’t it. It knows if you are at a Walmart or a local gymnasium, smartest virus in history.

The stupid thing is…We know who’s most likely to die. Senior citizens and people with pre existing conditions who probably aren’t the folks you’re going to bump into in a gym. I love the common sense of this Dr. Scott Atlas fellow from Stanford. He argued on Fox a couple of days ago that the cure reaching the point of being worse than the disease.

"Atlas went on to say, “The curves have been flattened. We actually know how to do a targeted protection policy. Frankly, I’m wondering why it took seven weeks after the lockdown of New York on March 20th to finally realize that the older vulnerable people need strict protection, with testing entrances into nursing homes, for instance.” Dr. Scott Atlas says coronavirus cure is now 'bigger' than disease: The costs are 'destructive' | Fox News

Here are the five facts he has argued and I totally agree with him.

Fact 1: The overwhelming majority of people do not have any significant risk of dying from COVID-19.

Fact 2: Protecting older, at-risk people eliminates hospital overcrowding.

Fact 3: Vital population immunity is prevented by total isolation policies, prolonging the problem.

Fact 4: People are dying because other medical care is not getting done due to hypothetical projections.

Fact 5: We have a clearly defined population at risk who can be protected with targeted measures.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/24/stanford-scott-atlas-end-isolation/

It’s time to protect those who need protection, to stop assuming anyone 5 feet 11 inches away from you in a group of 11 people or more is some kind of mortal threat and to get on with our lives.

[RTchoke]

@Rodeo

@RTchoke

Only because governors have picked winners and losers and apparently the virus can tell the difference if you are in Wal-mart or Joe’s Gym.

This damn virus is brilliant isn’t it. It knows if you are at a Walmart or a local gymnasium, smartest virus in history.

The stupid thing is…We know who’s most likely to die. Senior citizens and people with pre existing conditions who probably aren’t the folks you’re going to bump into in a gym. I love the common sense of this Dr. Scott Atlas fellow from Stanford. He argued on Fox a couple of days ago that the cure reaching the point of being worse than the disease.

"Atlas went on to say, “The curves have been flattened. We actually know how to do a targeted protection policy. Frankly, I’m wondering why it took seven weeks after the lockdown of New York on March 20th to finally realize that the older vulnerable people need strict protection, with testing entrances into nursing homes, for instance.”

It’s very tricksy, tricksy for sure.

[zantax]

@AngraMainyu

Because drunk drivers are a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance. Opening up everything is a threat to the public, by default, not by circumstance.
I’m sorry, is disease vector* too harsh? You have no right to be a biological weapon. Better?

Am I a biological weapon if I am not infected? Were the stay at home orders limited to the infected?

[Camp]

The courts will set this straight.

[WuWei]

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

Do you see the difference?

No.

My point is only about that species of response. Other responses could be used for those and then other differences could be appealed to justify the questioned policies.

Cuomo’s remark should be called out for being non-responsive hand-waving.

Two out of your three are private, not public.