Where was that rationale when Warren shared her family lore?
6 Likes
Slightly less generous.
1 Like
There is no news that you like at the national level.
Understood.
It is quite obvious you have never watched more than 2 minutesâŚif that.
She has made mistakes (who hasnât?) .
Please link to the conspiracy theories you have claimed.
Passion is often mistaken for hysteria.
Correct. Itâs all opinion and âanalysisâ designed to bring in the bucks.
Mod Note
Youâre getting personal. Please donât get personal.
And more original mocking of people who work their ass off earning a Phd.
FTR, I have worked hard labor jobs and hard jobs requiring no brawn, but a lot of mind muscle.
Hard labor is easier.
1 Like
Not completely true. Yes, she does commentary. She also does investigative reporting with her team.
She also writes excellent, well researched books.
https://www.amazon.com/Rachel-Maddow-Books/s?k=Rachel+Maddow&rh=n%3A283155
You are correct. I should have just ignored it.
Please delete.
1 Like
Why is analysis in quotes?
âdetailed examination of the elements or structure of somethingâ
Done. Thank you. You know you can delete your own posts?
Thatâs what CNN or NYT, I forget which, took to calling their opinion pieces.
YesâŚbut it was attached to the mod note, and I did not see the edit feature, where is I think we can deleteâŚyes?
Yes. Itâs taken care of.
Well, there is a difference but I get your point.
Most cable news sucks.
Maddow is an outlier. Most of the time.
And I disagree. Respectfully. And I have watched more than 2 minutes. 
Yep. An outlier. Sheâs out there standing on that limb long after it was cut off.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/27/rachel-maddows-deep-delusion-226266
1 Like
Interesting opinions piece. Lowry is certain entitled to his opinions, which in my opinion, he is off base.
This quote says a lot. Makes a truthful statement, then downplays something, as it was not something, when, it was very much something.
No one should deny Maddowâs considerable talents. Sheâs smart and a sprightly writer who does her homework and who can carry an hour of TV compellingly almost entirely on her own â a rare skill.
This wasnât simply mindless partisanship. It was a deeper delusion.
Yes, there were disturbing developments in the Mueller probe, but the evidence always tilted away from any Trump-Russian conspiracy.
I agree. She is intelligent, and her arguments are well thought out. Sheâs not a crazy conspiracy person like Jones, but she definitely has a left leaning agenda.
I think Chris Wallace is much closer to a centered journalist, even though he works for FOX. For the record, I would like to see Biden do an interview with him.
1 Like
I can only presume that the post is tongue in cheek.
