As we can plainly see, I answered the question when I said I did. Glad we could agree. You obviously don’t understand the difference between freedom from and liberty to - a core principle of conservatism and libertarianism. You have resorted to personal attacks in an attempt to save face.
You are begging the question with fingers in ears. I already explained why your attempts at reductionism will not work in this case.
I understand your frustration, the indoctrination makes it difficult to understand fundamental principles.
Nah. You’ve danced around the issue for days. It’s what you do. Ask questions. Never answer them directly. It’s a waste of time. Have the last word now.
An unarmed populace is ultimately a vulnerable populace.
Vulnerable to tyranny by the mob or the state.
There’s a reason black men tried their best to arm theirselves during the late 19th and early 20th century. In the south they were vulnerable to both state sanctioned violence and mob incited violence.
Don’t have it. If that book is telling you states didn’t curtail black’s rights to own guns you may want to reconsider the validity of your source. Try this:
