No ,most of the time they are wrong. Which is why they are apologizing after two years of fake news, obviously…
I have to agree with the article. Trump has exposed the Republican party as having about as much in common with “conservatism” as oil has in common with water. Let him finish off what is left of the Republican party. Maybe then we can get a new party that is actually conservative.
1 Like
Since it was in the New York Times it obviously was fake news!
Or, as I pointed out in another thread, an example of how the New York Times, as a real media outlet, gives voice to a wide range of opinions. The Times own lead editorial on Sunday began:
"So much for “complete and total exoneration.”
To the contrary, it turns out that Robert Mueller and his team of prosecutors and investigators found “substantial evidence” that President Trump broke federal law on numerous occasions by attempting to shut down or interfere with the nearly-two-year Russia investigation.
In addition to pointing to possible criminality, the report revealed a White House riddled with dysfunction and distrust, one in which Mr. Trump and his aides lie with contempt for one another and the public."
And we already know that his people will disregard his orders.
Better to let Giggles continue to erode the current incarnation of the GOP from within. Vote him out in 2020 and there’s no making a martyr of him.
all it revealed was gossip. Mueller spent 35 million and didn’t finish his job. Petulant child…
Let me clarify…will you accept all of this NYT OP-ED…no reservations.
Trump insisted today that his people do follow his orders. I believe this tees up potential perjury charges against Don McGahn and several other aides. 
Only the part I pasted…
Inaccurate and irrelevant.
Are you auditioning to replace Sarah Huckster Sanders?
Still covering for the Orange Petulant child
Gosh, you mean he’s a moderate? The rest of us knew that in 2016…
Own it. Just admit you were wrong. It won’t feel good at first.
Typical…out of context. Your games are tiring.
1 Like
As did I. One of many reasons I didn’t vote for him.
If he was a petulant child he would have fired Mueller like Mueller wanted…
This is like looking for some redacted secret in the Mueller report? If you have a point make it…
Trump is a union democrat. They once had big power in the dem party before it went socialist…
Yeah. Interesting play by Trump. The way to show he’s not a completely weak and feckless leader is to make the case that he’s really actually quite good at obstruction.
Image comment: This is an image from a movie called “Dodgeball.” It’s from a moment in the movie when one squad of Dodgeballers attempts a strategy that is likely to fail, yet the color commentator, played here by Jason Bateman, attempts to add validity to the proceedings.
This image is included with the post as a form of humorous added commentary. In many circumstances such an image, or “meme” as the kids are calling it, would stand on its own merits, but I do not want to run afoul of the use of images rules.
So, in summary: Image. Dodgeball. Comment about strategy. Funny.
4 Likes
Of course it would. Unless you want to be known as the party of “sour grapes”.
2020 is just around the corner. Let the voters decide.
Cause from what I am seeing right now you guys have nothing but laughing stocks for candidates.
