Many of the arguments for forced vaccinations just evaporated if this study is correct.
If hospitals are really concerned about preventing the spread of COVID, should they keep people who already survived COVID and fire everyone else, vaccinated or not?
If unvaccinated people can document that they already have antibodies to COVID, what basis is there to place any restrictions on them?
Yes, the government should be emphasizing losing weight, exercise, etc. rather than creating a witch hunt against the unvaccinated.
People should be able to find out whether they already have antibodies to the virus. Instead the FDA is strongly discouraging antibody tests.
From what I see, the main benefit of the vaccine is that reduces the dangers from COVID infection, but the end point is likely to come only after the vast majority have developed natural immunity to the disease.
They … aren’t risking death or serious injury from the vaccine. Like you said, they are reducing the dangers from COVID infection by a vast degree when compared to being unvaccinated.
It’s fascinating that some people would rather trust a blog with an author whose name is a character from a movie based on a book over people who dedicated their lives to science, biology and public service.
Healthy young people and children have an extremely low risk from COVID to begin with. Vaccine mandates make zero sense if they have immunity from a previous infection.
There is no compelling public interest in forcing vaccinations on people who already have superior immunity.
Yes, the government spreads a lot of misinformation.
The real crime is government policies of locking people up in their homes, closing gyms and parks, and preventing human interaction. These policies are reducing physical fitness and mental health.