New evidence in the J6 pipe bombing

New analysis of high-resolution videos indicates that the mysterious masked figure who allegedly planted the J6 pipe bombs was most likely a capitol policewoman. The woman moved on to work at the CIA later in 2021 and has since died of pancreatic cancer.

The bogus pipe bombing was an act of terrorism, but the FBI has been doing its best to stonewall any real investigations into what appears to be a criminal conspiracy that involves multiple federal agencies.

Will the conspirators ever face prosecution?

I’m reluctant to buy into a theory that involves a covert cia operative that has since passed away of pancreatic cancer.

11 Likes

The identification of the alleged bomber in the FBI videos is just the latest in a long string of revelations that contradict the official narrative and point to a conspiracy involving multiple federal agencies. The narrative has been that the mysterious bomber in the FBI videos left the bombs at the RNC and DNC on the evening of January 5, but the bombs were not discovered until about 1 pm on January 6, just as protestors were approaching the Capitol.

There are several huge problems with the official narrative. The first problem is that the Secret Service conducted a thorough search of the grounds around the DNC when VP-elect Harris arrived shortly before the discovery of the bombs. The search found no bombs even though the photos show that the bombs were in clear sight when they were discovered. The obvious explanation is that the bomb at the DNC was planted after the search.

A second problem is that videos released since in recent years after the events show Capitol Police were nonchalant in their reaction to the discovery of the bomb at the DNC. They made no attempt to cordon off the area and even allowed a group of children to cross the street by the DNC bomb. That is consistent with their knowing that the bombs had been disabled and were not a real threat.

A related problem is the obvious FBI coverup. As noted in the Blaze link, the FBI video had been edited to reduce the resolution and slow the motion to make analysis difficult. Agents reportedly were reassigned and investigations halted just even though there were promising leads to identify the alleged bombed. FBI officials have stonewalled congressional inquiries related to this the investigation.

The years of silence from the mainstream media has been another tell. Harris was inside the DNC building when the bombs were discovered–an obvious terrorist threat / possible assassination attempt. The media should have been all over this story, but there have been crickets. An official coverup is the obvious explanation.

2 Likes

These are not credible sources.

2 Likes

Yes, only the media who have repeatedly spread lies and misinformation for years are reliably compromised. Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies . . .

The New York Times spread false rumors from unnamed government officials that Officer Sicknick had been beaten to death by a fire extinguisher on January 6. As result of the false reports, Sicknick’s body lay in state at the Capitol, and his alleged murder was used in the Trump impeachment trial.

Only months later did the truth come out. Sicknick had died of natural caused on January 7. The claims that he had been bludgeoned to death should have been easily discounted with even a quick inspection of his body, but a conspiracy of silence and lies of omission have kept the hoax going.

The “deadly insurrection” hoax is based on this lie. The only people who died on January 6 were unarmed protestors. If only the protestors had burned a car or two, January 6 would have qualified as “mostly peaceful” protest by the mainstream-media standards used for BLM/antifa.

2 Likes

She’s dead..? BOOOOOOO!! :rofl:

1 Like

What makes these sources less credible than the mainstream media outlets that have lied consistently and provably to the American people for the last decade?

3 Likes

But it’s so CONVEEEENIENT…

1 Like

Someone had to try to get this hoax going today.

1 Like

I’m waiting for confirmation from Toonces the Cat before I take this seriously.

3 Likes

Liability.

This will eventually be either a huge story or a huge lawsuit.

One question…using the methods employed, how many people would have a gait in their walk that was 94% the same as the person in the video?

Depending on what they used…

2 Likes

In my case it’s 100%.

Don’t you hate flip answers that mean nothing?

1 Like

I have a very unique gait.

Why you angry?

I don’t doubt at all that it was a set up by the criminal cabal that is the current Democrat Party and legacy/msm media.

1 Like

No doubt of no doubt Everything bad always

Indeed! If it’s the Democrat Party, it’s always bad.

1 Like

That’s pretty interesting.

1 Like