Natural resources: Liz is completely clueless

Why?
Or current population is estimated to be 330 million. Do we have any specific reasons to be averse to 380 million?

1 Like

Maybe ole’ Granny High Cheekbones has a housing ( free of course) plan for these new border crashers? Or are they going to live on the streets of large liberal socialist controlled cities where they can engage in criminal activities and defecate on the sidewalks.

Fortunately ole’ Flabby Bloated Cheeto already houses them in cages.

3 Likes

It is. You need to read more.

1 Like

Yes. Because our carbon footprint will increase dramatically, traffic will be more horrid than it is now, habitat destruction, extinctions will be much worse and the power grid and water systems might not be able to handle it.

And BTW, who is trying to limit it at 380 million? Answer nobody. The current plan is unlimited immigration. What will it be like when we reach 400 million?

They’ll probably pick your vegetables and clean your house and allow you to keep living the comfortable life undocumented workers have helped provide Americans for decades. And over half of them will continue to pay more taxes than Trump and Amazon do.

Are these things a concern now, at 330 million?

1 Like

There it is! Didn’t take long either.

1 Like

3 million had power outages this summer, power company says it could continue for a decade.

California was rationing water (essentially) a couple years back as well. They were fining people for watering their lawns.

1 Like

Good lord… The DFW area rations water every few years as well… You know what is limiting the supply of fresh water in DFW? Rural landowners…

1 Like

Was she not born in the USA?

So was I…and so? :sunglasses:

You keep asking questions but won’t answer any.

Yea, this is more than one city in California:

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a pair of bills Thursday to set permanent overall targets for indoor and outdoor water consumption.

So what happens if the water districs around the state don’t meet the overall targets for water reduction?

will eventually allow state regulators to assess thousands of dollars in fines against jurisdictions that do not meet the goals.

The water districts will get fined thousands of dollars, in turn making wate for their users even more expensive.

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article211333594.html

How’s that comared to DFW area again? Has the Texas Gov signed legislation that effects the entire state?

You think they’re going to live in tree houses?

Sorry but they had their power turned off because the utilities are too cheap to properly address their infrastructure. It had nothing to do with too many people for the amount of available resources.

Hey let’s not talk about Scott Pruitt.

That would be your opinion

PG&E rates are regulated by the state of Californa. Rate increases MUST be approved by that board.

California should also be albe to regulate conditions of their transmission line corridores (utah does that).

So it’s not all on the power company

If she was not born in the USA then she could not become the President of the USA. If that is not the case, your claim is not based on anything other than a jaundiced point of view.

1 Like

You say she is clueless on natural resources then make then rant about immigration.

do you have an issue with expanding the foresting industry which is worth 31 billion a year? do you understand how much money America could get if they invested in proper forestry management.

BC a province of 5 million people push out 15 billion a year in foresting export due to their insanely well working system.

1 Like