Yup. A lot of storytelling is taking place, which is patently irrelevant when not done in harmony with the rules of our adversarial system. But hey, why have witnesses crossed examined which may expose their storytelling as being just that . . . stories?
Jezcoe
103
They are all telling the same story and we have emails and texts to back it up.
What evidence could there be that shows that all of these people in Trump’s inner circle are lying?
WuWei
104
It’s not a trial John, it’s a House hearing.
Which of the basic facts do you dispute?
-
Did Trump plan and promote a rally in the capitol on that day to disrupt the certification?
-
Did Trump direct the mob to the capitol building?
-
Did Trump call for peace immediately at the first hint of violence?
-
Did Trump take command and direct assistance to the site at any time?
He built that mob, he riled it up, and he aimed it at the electoral process.
For one reason only.
He is deluded John. And now he has cost you the Senate and therefore the judiciary. After the riots!
And still you cling. He’s a man, and not a good one, not the savior of the country.
Unclench your fist and let him go.
What I claimed is the Jan. 6th hearings are nothing more than political theater and without merit of any kind.
WuWei
106
Irrelevant John. Trump did it. You know it and I know it.
Time to face the facts.
So, because I support the advantages of abiding by our adversarial system in such matters, which helps to get to the truth and facts, you advise me to let it go because of your personal perceptions about what took place? Amazing. Simply amazing.
WuWei
108
One thing that has always bothered me about the Trump Times;
Why do conservatives believe it is a possible to find a conservative leader from NYC?
Because it’s not at all possible.
WuWei
110
No John, I am advising you to let Trump go.
Why do you belive an “adversarial system” is necessary in a House hearing?
WuWei
111
Yes John, they are. His own people told.
You are projecting. Defending our adversarial system has nothing to do with my feelings toward Trump, some of which I have already expressed.
You mean like the testimony of a witness who regurgitated what she heard someone else alleged occurred?
WuWei
114
No John, I’m not projecting.
What adversarial system in a House hearing, John? It’s not a trial.
No he is not the one projecting.
Exactly . . . it is nothing more than a star chamber political theater event and deserves no legitimacy whatsoever.
WuWei
118
Sure, and then there are all the others.
Trump planned and promoted the rally. Do you deny it?
Trump riled up the mob, do you deny it?
Trump aimed the mob at the capitol building, do you deny it?
Trump did not take command and mobilize assistance when it was obviousthere was violence, do you deny it?
It was all done to disrupt the electoral process, do you deny it?
WuWei
119
The Star Chamber was a trial, this is a House hearing. Where do you get the requirement for an “adversarial system”?
WuWei
120
Unclench your fists John, let the boat sail away.
Did you forget the “Peacefully and Patriotically” thing?
