You’d say. Well that settles it then.
We do vote over multiple days and after 5:00 PM.
“Shall not be infringed”
Samm: mobulis: Samm:The government does not make or own the guns to give away. They simply are prevented by the Constitution from infringing on your right to have them. The cost of purchasing a gun is between you and the individual who built it. It’s called commerce. But even you knew that … I hope.
Do guns have sales tax on them?
Commerce.
“Shall not be infringed”
It’s not an infringement, its a tax on a commercial transaction.
But it sounds like you would be okay with a poll tax.
mobulis: Samm: mobulis: Samm:The government does not make or own the guns to give away. They simply are prevented by the Constitution from infringing on your right to have them. The cost of purchasing a gun is between you and the individual who built it. It’s called commerce. But even you knew that … I hope.
Do guns have sales tax on them?
Commerce.
“Shall not be infringed”
It’s not an infringement, its a tax on a commercial transaction.
But it sounds like you would be okay with a poll tax.
Not ok with poll tax, why are taxes on guns not an infringement?
Samm: mobulis: Samm: mobulis: Samm:The government does not make or own the guns to give away. They simply are prevented by the Constitution from infringing on your right to have them. The cost of purchasing a gun is between you and the individual who built it. It’s called commerce. But even you knew that … I hope.
Do guns have sales tax on them?
Commerce.
“Shall not be infringed”
It’s not an infringement, its a tax on a commercial transaction.
But it sounds like you would be okay with a poll tax.
Not ok with poll tax, why are taxes on guns not an infringement?
I told you. The tax is tied to commerce, not the possession of the gun. If it were tied to the gun, the tax would be due everytime it was transferred, not just at the retail point.
But clearly you think it’s an infringement and, therefore, unconstitutional. So why do you tolerate it?
You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
You win. Sales tax on guns is an infringement. It should be stopped immediately.
Happy?
mobulis:You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
You win. Sales tax on guns is an infringement. It should be stopped immediately.
Happy?
Are guns banned?
Samm: mobulis:You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
You win. Sales tax on guns is an infringement. It should be stopped immediately.
Happy?
Are guns banned?
Infringed.
SimplyTrying: Samm: mobulis:By putting unsurmountable obstacles in the way (of voting,) which needing id for guns doesn’t.
What a laugh! The only people who are prevented from voting by voter ID laws are people who are ineligible to vote.
Republicans are doing everything they can to suppress minority votes. Why?
That’s a lie. Why are you repeating it?
Its the absolute truth and truth needs to be repeated.
SimplyTrying: Samm:That’s the thing about proving that something did not happen, because of something else. When it doesn’t happen, there’s nothing to report so it isn’t recorded. Think about how many automobile accidents did not happen because someone was driving defensively and avoided the accident. The same goes for acts of violence that did not occur because the assailant was deterred because their intended victim was armed.
I’m sorry. I just don’t buy that.
That doesn’t rebut it. Maybe you can look it up in the almanac of things that did not happen and get back to me.
No. Your too snarky for a conversation I think.
You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
Anything you will not accept for voting is a start. Will you accept having to fill out a form that nobody can help you with at all and having it called in to the FBI and them being told you voted republican or democrat?
Do you accept being fingerprinted to vote?
Do you accept having to carry a photo ID that has to be renewed every so often?
Do you accept having to show proof of a need to vote?
Do you accept local cops deciding if you have a good enough character to vote?
Are guns banned?
Have been. Are there dems in leadership positions trying to again?
Its the absolute truth and truth needs to be repeated.
Actually it’s not the truth. Republicans try to suppress democrat votes and vice versa. That in one case they are minority votes is correlation, not causation.
mobulis:You guys are the ones that think that anything that has even the slightest chance of inconveniencing getting a gun falls under “shall not be infringed”.
Anything you will not accept for voting is a start. Will you accept having to fill out a form that nobody can help you with at all and having it called in to the FBI and them being told you voted republican or democrat?
Do you accept being fingerprinted to vote?
Do you accept having to carry a photo ID that has to be renewed every so often?
Do you accept having to show proof of a need to vote?
Do you accept local cops deciding if you have a good enough character to vote?
Let me know when you can kill with a vote.
Let me know when you can kill with a vote.
You don’t know your history.
A right is not a right?
That was weak.
mobulis:Let me know when you can kill with a vote.
You don’t know your history.
A right is not a right?
That was weak.
I know history, nobody ever killed with a vote.
WuWei: mobulis:Let me know when you can kill with a vote.
You don’t know your history.
A right is not a right?
That was weak.
I know history, nobody ever killed with a vote.
Oh no. You’ve asked for. Be ready for a great schooling.