Not true. I’ll post this again for your benefit.
Russia May Build a Pipeline Through North Korea
Trump's diplomacy may have cleared Russia's path to a lucrative deal.
Not true. I’ll post this again for your benefit.
the antecedent of my “they” can be found in the post to which I was responding. If that poster used the word without being specific with names and SSNs, they you should ask him to provide them.
Now supposedly Russia is suddenly working with North Korea to run a pipeline through NK to South Korea…
Coincidence?
Of course Obama meddles in several elections of other countries and the Dims don’t give a ■■■■ either
I guess you wouldn’t care if NK bombed us then cause hey we bomb countries too right
Now supposedly Russia is suddenly working with North Korea to run a pipeline through NK to South Korea…
Coincidence?
Trump's diplomacy may have cleared Russia's path to a lucrative deal.
CaughtInTheMiddle: Call_me_Ishmael: CaughtInTheMiddle:m saying you don’t know what they’ve uncovered and are siding with/covering for foreign entities over our own investigators.
you should just own that. it’s not like it’s a secret or anything.
I know that if they had proof that our president was under the control of Russia, they would protect the republic.
You disagree with that?
Dude. They’re not just investigating Trump. Is he really all you care about over US interests?
Ok. backpedaling suits you people.
(LOL… they are pretending that proof of Trump’s supposed collusion has not been on their lips, their every thought and hope since Hillary said “let’s say the Russians did it” on November 9, 2016)
The continued talk about collusion would have happened with or without Hillary’s election. She’s already maintained that.
Well now…
Nothing. He doesn’t believe it’s a big deal apparently.
So it wasn’t a big deal until she lost. Cool.
Bosun:It’s ironic when Obama was told about Russian meddling years ago he did ■■■■■ Of course Obama meddles in several elections of other countries and the Dims don’t give a ■■■■ either
Not true. I’ll post this again for your benefit.
But what did they do other than to get a bunch of administration types and FBI Trump haters to spy on their political opponents, based on a Russian telling someone they had emails (or alternitavely on an unsupported dossier)?
FBI employees discussed their views of Trump in what they thought were private messages. Some later joined the Mueller investigation.
She’s already maintained that
HAHAHAHAHAHA…OMG… you are actually citing a Clinton statement, as though truth has ever touched her lips.
Ohhhhhh… that’s right… you carried her water even long after she lost with that avatar you had.
Curioser and curioser
No, it’s definitely not his first rodeo, he has a long history of abuse and misconduct.
Establishment DC types who reflexively defend Robert Mueller haven't explained how they came to trust him so completely. It's a question worth asking.
Est. reading time: 13 minutes
Why don’t you explain for us how Trump’s talks with NK are responsible for the Russians offering a pipleline deal? They’ve been cozy with NK for sixty plus years and supplied much of their military hardware throughout the history of the Regime going all the way back to the early post WWII era.
At the end of WWII Russia controlled the north half of Korea and the US the south half.
Well lord knows if Hillary said it, it’s got to be true… .
In what fairy tale land is that the case?
DougBH:So how the heck are you going to prosecute someone if your response is that you can’t show the evidence, for or against them, to anybody?
The answer, of course, it that you are not. Mueller simply didn’t expect to be called on this and now his bluff has been called and hes got nothing.
IF there was proof of wrongdoing, the alleged perpetrator would already know what they had done.You think this is Mueller’s first rodeo? Your assertion is laughable and suggests the Mueller is a dime store amateur.
The fact that he is experienced and thorough is what has everybody on edge. They know that even little stuff is not going to slip through the cracks.
The continued talk about collusion would have happened with or without Hillary’s election. She’s already maintained that.
Whose to say that the “independent” counsels staff is not trying to meddle with the mid term elections?
madasheck:She’s already maintained that
HAHAHAHAHAHA…OMG… you are actually citing a Clinton statement, as though truth has ever touched her lips.
Ohhhhhh… that’s right… you carried her water even long after she lost with that avatar you had.
Every time cons demonize Hillary they show how little they know in light of clinging to the shorts of Trump, the most corrupt president in history.
Well lord knows if Hillary said it, it’s got to be true… .
In what fairy tale land is that the case?
Certainly not in the fairy tale land where cons live.
madasheck:The continued talk about collusion would have happened with or without Hillary’s election. She’s already maintained that.
Whose to say that the “independent” counsels staff is not trying to meddle with the mid term elections?
Yeah, unless it’s a conspiracy theory, cons aren’t happy.