He was the campaign manager at the time. At least one person from the campaign was aware. Lol

Allan

1 Like

I am pretty sure Mueller will not be pleased at explaining himself.

Trump being stronger? I see this, you may not.

:see_no_evil:

I’m not sure where else to go, given that you believe everything is hearsay unless someone states it themselves under oath.

So by that measure, we must conclude that anyone who was interviewed by Mueller was simply reciting hearsay about anything having to do with Trump?

But of course we know that you are only playing the hearsay card when it fits your Trump hating agenda.

Actually Mueller’s office stated that there is no conflict. Not sure how many times I have to keep pointing that out to you???

July 18 will be a lot of fun.

:partying_face:

Do you know how silly that sounds? If that really were the case, there would be no need for Mueller to appear before the house committees. Based on your silly argument nothing Mueller says will be relevant because the report would trump everything he says.

Just to be clear about what was in the joint statement, here it is:

“The Attorney General has previously stated that the Special Counsel repeatedly affirmed that he was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found the President obstructed justice. The Special Counsel’s report and his statement today made clear that the office concluded it would not reach a determination — one way or the other — about whether the President committed a crime. There is no conflict between these statements,"

1 Like
  1. Trump Jr. knew what he was looking for. And he wanted it bad.
  2. Manafort shared data. He wasn’t a loner.
  3. You’re actually defending Flynn? Did you forget Carter Page, too? :slight_smile:
  4. What about the last-minute Ukraine change in the RNC platform? That was Trump’s doing.

#readthereport. The facts are there.

Once again, a rogue person in the campaign providing polling data to a Ukrainian operative is a far cry from that campaign actively seeking to work with the Russians.

You see. I predicted this very thing would happen above. The same repeat over and over and over from the same poster. Its why you might as well be talking to a brick wall.

2 Likes

The joint statement from Mueller’s office wasn’t in his report. Given that the statement was made after the report was published, one would think that statement would become the definitive word.

And you guys aren’t continuing to repeat yourselves? :roll_eyes:

Exactly. No determination…No collusion…No obstruction.

Sometimes the simple answer is the correct answer.

:ballet_shoes:

The quote below is demonstrably not true:

Based on your silly argument nothing Mueller says will be relevant because the report would trump everything he says.

I wasn’t talking to you, no need for you to reply to me. I already told you I have no interest in your broken record.

:repeat:

The definitive statement will come mueller himself under oath.

Allan

One wouldn’t think that at all.

The joint statement isn’t in the report. :wink:

I’d even say the 17th during his testimony will be quite entertaining.

Allan