Mueller to testify July 17

biggestal99 · 2019-06-27T16:54:27.936Z

peek-a-boo:

What about the joint statement referring to Barr’s senate testimony

So who do you believe,office hearsay or a direct statement from the man himself.

It’s like you are actually oblivious to his direct statement which clarifies his take on things.

Would you like me to post it one more time.

Allan

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T16:55:33.591Z

Barr’s Senate testimony and Mueller’s joint statement support my arguments.

#factsmatter

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T16:57:10.184Z

The joint statement was an official communication from Mueller’s office. If you seriously believe official communications are hearsay, then you really have gone off the deep end.

madasheck · 2019-06-27T16:58:51.034Z

peek-a-boo:

Barr’s Senate testimony and Mueller’s joint statement support my arguments.

#factsmatter

Barr gave Americans an inaccurate summary of the Mueller Report before any of the public had a chance to see it. Mueller’s joint statement was not the statement of record. The Mueller Report is. And that’s where #factsmatter.

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T16:59:12.940Z

Mueller found no evidence to charge Trump or anyone else with collusion, conspiracy or obstruction. No charges. Case closed.

#factsmatter

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T17:00:14.830Z

You continue to ignore Barr’s senate testimony. I can only assume you are doing that intentionally because it doesn’t fit your narrative.

DOLOOP · 2019-06-27T17:00:23.687Z

peek-a-boo:

Mueller found no evidence to charge Trump or anyone else with collusion, conspiracy or obstruction. No charges. Case closed.

#factsmatter

Wrong.

#ignornanceiscomforting

Camp · 2019-06-27T17:00:29.343Z

The test is simple. What is true and what is wishful thinking?

Trump has become stronger as President. That is true.

Mueller will be none to pleased to yet again explain what has been thoroughly presented.

Camp · 2019-06-27T17:01:59.699Z

Essentially calling the report wrong will not be welcome on July 17.

madasheck · 2019-06-27T17:02:09.171Z

peek-a-boo:

Mueller found no evidence to charge Trump or anyone else with collusion, conspiracy or obstruction. No charges. Case closed.

#factsmatter

Mueller to testify July 17 Politics

You continue to ignore Barr’s senate testimony. I can only assume you are doing that intentionally because it doesn’t fit your narrative.

The Mueller Report and Barr don’t agree. The Mueller Report is the statement of record, not Barr. Barr’s was just his opinion. Like yours and mine. None of them are what counts. The Mueller Report does. #factsmatter

madasheck · 2019-06-27T17:03:15.432Z

Camp:

The test is simple. What is true and what is wishful thinking?

Trump has become stronger as President. That is true.

Mueller will be none to pleased to yet again explain what has been thoroughly presented.

And you know this how?

DOLOOP · 2019-06-27T17:03:53.593Z

Camp:

Essentially calling the report wrong will not be welcome on July 17.

I didn’t call the report wrong. I called the statement wrong. Because it does nto even remotely represent the report.

I understand the need for willful ignorance in the regard.

PurpnGold · 2019-06-27T17:07:10.354Z

madasheck:

The Mueller Report and Barr don’t agree. The Mueller Report is the statement of record, not Barr. Barr’s was just his opinion. Like yours and mine. None of them are what counts. The Mueller Report does. #factsmatter

Text book definition of confirmation bias. The Mueller report is the official record. Period.

Cons are looking at unofficial sources to discredit the official, credible, source. It’s mind boggling.

Now the official source will testify and basically regurgitate the report. This is what has cons nervous.

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T17:07:40.146Z

PurpnGold:

They weren’t “rebuffed” by the campaign.

Don Jr “I love it”

Seriously? That’s your evidence?

Manafort sharing polling data

Manafort shared the data with a Ukrainian. He did this on his own. The Trump campaign was unaware, and no one really knows where that data ended up.

Flynn meeting with Russians before and after the election

Flynn addressed a conference before the election. Following the election he was acting within the capacity of his new role during the transition. Not sure exactly how one can coordinate with the Russians to win the election if the election has already taken place.

Roger Stone talking with Guccifer

There is lots of speculation regarding these contacts, but they really don’t support the notion that the Trump campaign was actively seeking ways to coordinate with the Russians.

biggestal99 · 2019-06-27T17:09:03.863Z

peek-a-boo:

The joint statement was an official communication from Mueller’s office. If you seriously believe official communications are hearsay, then you really have gone off the deep end

And if you don’t believe a direct statement from Mueller himself, than you will join me on the deep end

Allan

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T17:09:09.722Z

Simple matter to show me the indictments.

biggestal99 · 2019-06-27T17:10:44.032Z

peek-a-boo:

The Trump campaign was unaware, and no one really knows where that data ended up.

He was the campaign manager at the time. At least one person from the campaign was aware. Lol

Allan

Camp · 2019-06-27T17:11:48.696Z

I am pretty sure Mueller will not be pleased at explaining himself.

Trump being stronger? I see this, you may not.

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T17:12:11.720Z

I’m not sure where else to go, given that you believe everything is hearsay unless someone states it themselves under oath.

So by that measure, we must conclude that anyone who was interviewed by Mueller was simply reciting hearsay about anything having to do with Trump?

But of course we know that you are only playing the hearsay card when it fits your Trump hating agenda.

peek-a-boo · 2019-06-27T17:13:51.197Z

Actually Mueller’s office stated that there is no conflict. Not sure how many times I have to keep pointing that out to you???