sikofit
November 27, 2019, 4:32pm
22
Im sorry that I pointed out that you cited one of the biggest fraudsters on the entire internet as proof
1 Like
BlueTex:
A few. How many cases of voter suppression did you find?
Here is 3,000 for starters…
U.S. – 3 Nov 18
Two federal courts on Friday issued rulings that order Georgia to allow some 3,0…
voting registration applications placed on hold due to Georgia’s “exact-match” law, requiring that personal information on voter applications match what is on state databases.
Your “starter” is an epic fail. There is zero evidence that anyone was suppressed. If your voter information doesn’t match the public record than you don’t vote. That’s called common sense election protection.
BlueTex
November 27, 2019, 4:40pm
24
Except the court ruled that at least 3,000 WERE prevented from voting when their registrations were put on hold… That’s EXACTLY how voters are suppressed… The supposed mismatch did not allow voters to contest the mismatch…
Show me a court that has not been poisoned by politics.
Their documents did not match the records. What should they have done?
They are no worse than CNN. Both have chosen sides and are committed to an agenda.
Do you like this one better?
sikofit
November 27, 2019, 4:46pm
27
That was 2 1/2 years ago, what did it find?
The follow up report a year later says they didn’t find anything.
2 Likes
Good Lord! Here’s one of the key figures in this decision. Appointed by Obama, hates police. Judges are no better than politicians.
BlueTex
November 27, 2019, 4:54pm
29
Go and prove their identity, which court showed they were prevented from doing because Georgia’s registration software was down.
1 Like
BlueTex
November 27, 2019, 4:55pm
30
Gee… I’ll bet that judge even caused the crash of Georgia’s registration system… Dang liberals, they are so crafty…
1 Like
You want to see real voter supression?
Each square in the cartogram represents one electoral vote.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president, and it would come into effect only when it would...
I live in Florida. If FL votes for Trump 60/40 in 2020, but Warren wins the national vote, you just disenfranchised several million Republican voters.
Not surprisingly, the states who signed on to this ■■■■■■■■ are blue states.
sikofit
November 27, 2019, 5:01pm
32
How is that any different than the millions of California voters “disenfranchised” in 2016?
How were they disenfranchised?
If you’re talking about the EC, Amend the Constitution to “fix it”
Did their votes go to Trump, even though they cast their vote for Hillary?
This is an end run arouond the EC.
JimmyC
November 27, 2019, 5:07pm
34
1 Like
sikofit
November 27, 2019, 5:08pm
35
The same way they would be in your scenario
BlueTex
November 27, 2019, 5:08pm
36
Of course, we could just go with a nationwide popular vote…
sikofit
November 27, 2019, 5:09pm
37
How would they be disenfranchised?
That’s not an argument. You are just dismissing this court ruling because you didn’t prevail. You are placing your politics into the court room.
1 Like
None of those instances are targeting minorities. Minorities and non minorities have the same requirements. Exactly the same.
1 Like
Do you seriously not see that, or are you just trolling?
The state voted for Trump, but the EC votes were given to his opponent.
The “red votes” didn’t count.