More voter suppression?

Im sorry that I pointed out that you cited one of the biggest fraudsters on the entire internet as proof

1 Like

voting registration applications placed on hold due to Georgia’s “exact-match” law, requiring that personal information on voter applications match what is on state databases.

Your “starter” is an epic fail. There is zero evidence that anyone was suppressed. If your voter information doesn’t match the public record than you don’t vote. That’s called common sense election protection.

Except the court ruled that at least 3,000 WERE prevented from voting when their registrations were put on hold… That’s EXACTLY how voters are suppressed… The supposed mismatch did not allow voters to contest the mismatch…

Show me a court that has not been poisoned by politics.

Their documents did not match the records. What should they have done?

They are no worse than CNN. Both have chosen sides and are committed to an agenda.
Do you like this one better?

That was 2 1/2 years ago, what did it find?

The follow up report a year later says they didn’t find anything. :rofl:

2 Likes

Good Lord! Here’s one of the key figures in this decision. Appointed by Obama, hates police. Judges are no better than politicians.

Go and prove their identity, which court showed they were prevented from doing because Georgia’s registration software was down.

1 Like

Gee… I’ll bet that judge even caused the crash of Georgia’s registration system… Dang liberals, they are so crafty…

1 Like

You want to see real voter supression?

I live in Florida. If FL votes for Trump 60/40 in 2020, but Warren wins the national vote, you just disenfranchised several million Republican voters.

Not surprisingly, the states who signed on to this ■■■■■■■■ are blue states.

How is that any different than the millions of California voters “disenfranchised” in 2016?

How were they disenfranchised?

If you’re talking about the EC, Amend the Constitution to “fix it”

Did their votes go to Trump, even though they cast their vote for Hillary?

This is an end run arouond the EC.

The “left” isn’t complaining about random individuals committing registration ffraud. They are complaining about systematic voter suppression efforts targeted towards minorities.

https://twitter.com/haroldpollack/status/1051657219899617280?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1051657219899617280&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Fquery%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Ftwitter.com%252Fharoldpollack%252Fstatus%252F1051657219899617280%26widget%3DTweet

1 Like

The same way they would be in your scenario

Of course, we could just go with a nationwide popular vote… :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

How would they be disenfranchised?

That’s not an argument. You are just dismissing this court ruling because you didn’t prevail. You are placing your politics into the court room.

1 Like

None of those instances are targeting minorities. Minorities and non minorities have the same requirements. Exactly the same.

1 Like

Do you seriously not see that, or are you just trolling?

The state voted for Trump, but the EC votes were given to his opponent.

The “red votes” didn’t count.

We could but we won’t.