So the excuse comes down to Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr were motivated to protect Democrats from serious criminal activity.
It couldn’t possibly be that it was investigated and there was insufficient evidence to prosecute, could it?
I assume it will come out in court if it gets that far.
Let’s bookmark this thread and compare notes in a year or so.
It makes perfect sense. But, you’re probably right. It’s a fake story about the fake story that the democrats invented about Trump. We’ll see. I don’t think Bondi and Patel are foot draggers like other republican DOJ.
1 Like
I neither said nor implied it’s a fake story. That was uncalled for.
Clearly there was a whistleblower report in 2017.
The implication from you and e7alr is that two AGs in Trump’s first term were motivated to protect (at a minimum) a Democrat rep who the President regularly disparaged as a bad person. Seems pretty ballsy to withhold (or mislead about) that report from their boss.
But who knows? Maybe that’s what happened.
Why don’t we bookmark this thread and compare notes in a year or so.
My implication is there are a lot of uniparty types (think swamp creatures) who work to protect the status quo and access to the pork barrel. There was also a lot of open contempt for Trump on both sides of the aisle, both before and after the election. We see a lot of that even today. The Republican establishment had, and has, plenty of these types of individuals.
1 Like
So all of this is just made up. You don’t actually have evidence of any of this to support your wall fo text. Like i said you made it up and put flare on it
Everyone get it. It was Durham who lost. We know this. Everything else isn’t just supposition it’s complete fairy tales.
Lmao Jesus Christ dude! Was Comey FBI director during the time Sussman talked to the Feds and said the Dossier was real and not paid for by Hillary? (Yes!) was Maureen Comey prosecuting someone who had confidential conversations with her dads agency? (Yes) Did the Sussman evidence that expired past the statute of limitations exist when her dad was director (Yes). Did Durham appoint a prosecutor on his team who has intent to ensure the case fails (Yes). Could Maureen Comey leak things to the FBI to undermine Durham’s investigation (Yes). Was she fired for intentionally botching high profile liberal cases (Yes according to Pam Bondi) Is her father being investigated for pushing fake Russian Dossier propaganda with Brennan and Clapper (Yes). Did Sussman push the Dossier to the Fed (Yes), are you clueless? (Yes). Do you need to be lead prosecutor to ensure a conviction fails (No). Did Maureen subpoena her dad to get the evidence before the limitations ran out (No) Was the Durham team aware the Feds were involved pushing the fake dossier (Yes)
Seems like they were throwing the case to me.
Of course you need th lead prosecutor when you have evidence that it was anybody but. When you don’t you just make things up make everything more sinister
Just as you made things up about the kid who tried to murder the president. About his accounts and things that were found on him etc.
Great thriller fiction is often assisted by having certain basis for it. That’s what makes it easier for it to be believable. That’s why when people read your fiction. They believe it.
WTH are you even talking about, stop with the red herrings and stay on topic and debate the points I brought up. It has nothing to do with who’s lead prosecutor, I proved several reasons why Durham was doomed from the start and several reasons why Maureen Comey would want this to fail and how she could harm the investigation, you have nothing. The points I brought up are 100% facts. You have nothing but circular logic. And you won’t answer the questions because you know it blows your argument.
No you didn’t prove anything. What you did was take a murder board and try to connect the dots. You don’t actually have the string to connect them just the dots
That is exactly my point - what you posted are facts. What you dont have is any evidence leading to the conclusion that she had any hand in Durham losing the Sussman trial. Just imagination and supposition
I am staying on topic. The topic is writing fiction because it’s easier than admitting being wrong.
Murder Board this is about Russia collusion! Answer the questions please! Or don’t engage. You won’t answer because it destroys your argument. Dude she was literally fired for botching high profile cases and Sussman was listed as one of them by Bondi herself Jesus dude! You don’t think she has evidence to prove as to why that would be, while her father and the prosecution team she was on is being investigated?
Cite bondi. Give me the bondi quote.
You don’t want to know.
Of course he doesn’t want to know he’s nothing but bad faith arguments, he doesn’t think Maureen Comey could undermine the Sussman case. 
1 Like
Hahaha you made it up. Oh my gosh. You made up a Bondi quote. Perfection.
Epstein, Diddy and Sussman are why she’s fired dude! Everyone knows it! I don’t need to post the obvious.
There is no quote. You made it up. Everyone knows THAT.
I didn’t make it up because Durham and Comey and everyone involved with the Dossier are being investigated. She had intent to blow the case. It’s amazing every team or case she’s on even remotely close to a high profile lib is an abject failure, why is that?
It’s because you are a fiction writer
Diddy is a felon facing possibly years in prison. A trafficking charge was hard to prove. He was not set free but actually convicted. That’s not abject failure
You have no evidence no quotes nothing connecting the Durham loss to her.
But you won’t stop because you can’t. It flows out of you. You are a natural at making things up on the spot. Make money on it.
High profile libs were at he and Epstein parties dude! Bill Clinton is being subpoenaed for being physically intimate with minors or having knowledge of it as president. Is Durham and his team being investigated by Bondi for their handling of their investigation, is Comey being investigated? Answer the questions. Durhams investigation is one of many reasons she’s fired.
Sure they are being investigated. You have no evidence that she was fired for Sussman you even made up a quote to support your imagination
