What’s the purpose of bringing up isolated incidents and pointing to them as evidence that nothing is being done
The only way for all instances to disappear is for there to be zero crime
This is exactly what happened in the Walgreens thread
Walgreens said their theft numbers are stabilized to a lower rate.
Posters started posting isolated incidents as if somehow proves Walgreens own numbers wrong
Theconclusion i can draw is that zero crime is what is being argued
Same here. Voter fraud is illegal. Voter fraud is prosecuted.
A poster calls for something to be done against voter fraud based on this particular isolated incident
So the conclusion is that the only way to show that something is being done is for there to. W zero crime.
It’s not trolling or whatever other name you want to assign. It’s a logical conclusion. There is another one but then it would require people to admit being hyper partisan and not fair and inquisitive….
That’s the point of my claim. To draw out honesty.
No that’s how i always argue. That’s literally how i argue in almost every discussion.
I already said that it is my conclusion. Meaning yea you are right that nobody said it
Of course nobody said because it’s illogical for there to be zero crime. It’s pure nonsense. The isolated incidents are nothing but hysteria to make something either more prevent than it is or to point out how nothing is being done stop it.
Not sure how more clear than that i can be.
I have a strange feeling that the post was skimmed though. Which is fine i guess
Ever notice how frequently people who decry a certain behavior are themselves guilty of such ? i.e. all the family values preachers who get caught in a back of a limo with meth and an underage boy or something of that
Trumpleton lawyer votes in 2 states over multiple elections. Now he’s looking at prison.
“OHIO GOP VOTER FRAUD: A lawyer from Shaker Heights, who donated to Trump, is set to go to prison for committing election fraud, which the judge described as a crime against every citizen. The judge, Andrew Santoli, gave the attorney, James Saunders, a three-year prison sentence and a $10,000 fine, emphasizing that his actions were purposeful and deliberate. Santoli stated that Saunders violated the fundamental right of every individual in the country to have one vote and one voice, making it a significant felony.”