Are you referring to chemical versus surgical? Because if you are, from the babyâs context no itâs not. Again, I can provide you a link if you wish, but Iâd rather not have to.
1st trimester and 2nd equally moral? How about 3rd?
Huh? Are we talking about the fetuses feelings now?
My morality on the subject is directly in line with the law. If the law changes, my morality on the subject will likely stay the same. If the science changes on the subject of viability, for example, then that would change my morality on the subject.
I am talking about what happens to the baby. I didnât mention âfeelingsâ.
Legality, morality and science are 3 different things, but I think I understand what you are saying. You are basing your moral view of it on the basis that it is legal? If so, I would be very careful of that. But itâs your morality, you are free to base it on whatever you choose.
Yes what happens to the fetus is that the fetus is removed from the uterus. End result is the same.
I know the difference between the 3, that is why I separated them out.
My morality on the subject just happens to align with the law. The law closely aligns with the science of viability. Science will likely move the age of viability to the left and at that point my morality on the subject may change, even if the law doesnât.