Moore v Harper may be mooted

Republicans won control of the North Carolina Supreme Court in November and have granted a rehearing that could potentially reverse the judgement of the previous Democratic majority in redistricting cases. If this happens in an expedited manner, it could very well moot Moore v Harper and put to rest the whole Independent State Legislature Theory for the time being.

Moore v Harper was argued on December 7, but likely won’t be decided until near the end of the term in late June. But if the North Carolina Supreme Court reverses itself before then, the United States Supreme Court will have no active “case or controversy” on which to decide Moore v Harper.

The North Carolina Supreme Court should move as fast as possible to decide this case and defuse the potential bomb of Moore v Harper.

1 Like

seeing as how the court refused to actually even look at a single case in the last election and sidestepped all of them on technicalities, some of them complete BS, I really have no problem removing the courts from the job they don’t want and refused to do. Let election greivances go to the legislatures to decide.

2 Likes

Sure. Checks and balances is an antiquated notion anyway.

what check is the court performing when it refuses to look at cases and uses BS theories to avoid doing so?

You really want elected politicians looking into their own elections? That seems like a good idea to you?

The courts didn’t use “BS theories”. That was the plaintiffs.

yes the courts did. and it wouldn’t be their own elections.

I remember this case being discussed earlier, probably in this forum. It was hypocritical for the dissenting judge (re the rehearing) to complain about the politicization of the rehearing when the original case was strictly along party lines and it was pretty obvious was rushed to get a decision before the party dominance changed. It seemed obvious at the time the only result would be this rehearing.
I would guess the SC would not hear a case that was obviously going to become moot.

1 Like

The cases were BS theories with no evidence, that’s why.

how would anyone know since they were all dismissed on technicalities before any evidentiary hearing?