I guess I will have to give the Missouri Attorney General credit for trying to write the biggest load of chutzpah ballot summary in history.
A Missouri Judge told the A.G. what he could go do with it.
The combative language proposed by the A.G. for the ballot summary:
“allow for dangerous, unregulated, and unrestricted abortions, from conception to live birth, without requiring a medical license or potentially being subject to medical malpractice” and that they would “nullify longstanding Missouri law protecting the right to life, including but not limited to partial-birth abortion.”
The ballot summary will now feature neutral language.
I haven’t read the ballot initiative. My question is, if you take out the word “dangerous” does it do all the things described? If it does, “dangerous” may actually be an apt descriptor
This whole thing was just a desperate attempt to stop the inevitable, i.e. the restoration of the previous norm under Planned Parenthood v Casey. Even in red States such as Kansas and Kentucky pro-life has been unable to prevail.
They brought this all down on themselves by getting Roe overturned.
If they hadn’t done that, they wouldn’t be worrying about ballot summaries.