Is this English?
Funny thing is Barr is Catholic, and Catholicism is on the rise just not with people like Barr but mostly with poor South Americans.
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.
Did he at any part or time say that secularists should be prohibited from speaking by the government? Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
Which one is going against the Constitutional principles?
Oh? So he was arrested?
I thought that was Lizzo
She’s another one. There’s also a girl who did like a ballad cover of a Sublime song, name escapes me.
I am more of a soundcloud trap rapper guy myself.
Did I say that right?
Is this English?
Ha.
A lot of came about from the rabbit hole I went down one night after the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine… someone who I had never heard of but the dude is quite something.
That led me to Internet explore a few subcultures for a night where I find no value in what they do… but man… they do something.
Ha.
A lot of came about from the rabbit hole I went down one night after the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine… someone who I had never heard of but the dude is quite something.
That led me to Internet explore a few subcultures for a night where I find no value in what they do… but man… they do something.
“But man…they do something.”
Brilliant!!!
“Things Bill Barr apparently does not understand religious freedom; secularism; the U.S. Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, freedom of assembly, and religious liberty and how these interrelate,”
Like libs do?
Funny thing is Barr is Catholic, and Catholicism is on the rise just not with people like Barr but mostly with poor South Americans.
Catholicism is the primary religion with most South Americans.
They really like that help the poor stuff.
Ha.
A lot of came about from the rabbit hole I went down one night after the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine… someone who I had never heard of but the dude is quite something.
That led me to Internet explore a few subcultures for a night where I find no value in what they do… but man… they do something.
Well, Tekashi is an embarrassment even to other mumble rappers.
Lana del rey, good cover.
Ha.
A lot of came about from the rabbit hole I went down one night after the arrest of Tekashi 6ix9ine… someone who I had never heard of but the dude is quite something.
That led me to Internet explore a few subcultures for a night where I find no value in what they do… but man… they do something.
Well, Tekashi is an embarrassment even to other mumble rappers.
I guess I am someone who likes the mainstream a little to much.
There are bands that I am rabid about that no one else cares about…so I get it. Like I have gotten into 70’s Afropop. I think it is awesome.
Others don’t agree.
I am not going to yuck anyone else’s yum
But yeah… I just don’t get it.
But I don’t think it was made for me and that is okay.
Lana del rey, good cover.
Yeah that’s her, my girl is all about Lana del Rey.
But yeah… I just don’t get it.
But I don’t think it was made for me and that is okay.
I don’t think we’re supposed to get it lol.
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.
Did he at any part or time say that secularists should be prohibited from speaking by the government? Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
Which one is going against the Constitutional principles?She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Railing against pop culture… a tale as old as time
Quickest way to become a bitter old dried up husk of a human being.
as opposed to what, retirees watching billie eilish videos
Who the ■■■■ is Billie Eilish?
only a “bitter old dried up husk of a human being” wouldn’t know
Railing against pop culture… a tale as old as time
Quickest way to become a bitter old dried up husk of a human being.
as opposed to what, retirees watching billie eilish videos
Who the ■■■■ is Billie Eilish?
only a “bitter old dried up husk of a human being” wouldn’t know
I am not complaining about her existence… I just don’t know who she is.
That is the difference.
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.
Did he at any part or time say that secularists should be prohibited from speaking by the government? Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
Which one is going against the Constitutional principles?She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Great. So who exactly suggested that Barr’s speech was unconstitutional ?
Secularists and their allies have marshaled all the forces of mass communication
Trump uses Twitter to ramble and rattle incoherently to 65.7 million people. And Barr wants to talk about secularists? Come on Son!
Well, apparently it goes against free speech and the Constitution to allow someone to talk about religion at a University.
Did he at any part or time say that secularists should be prohibited from speaking by the government? Apparently some there believe a non secularist should not be allowed to speak at a university.
Which one is going against the Constitutional principles?She said that Barr speaking in Notre Dame is unconstitutional ?
Professor Feldman wrote in response to Barr’s speech. “Incredible that a law school would have such a legal know-nothing to speak,” she added.
Great. So who exactly suggested that Barr’s speech was unconstitutional ?
“Things Bill Barr apparently does not understand religious freedom; secularism; the U.S. Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, freedom of assembly, and religious liberty and how these interrelate,”
What Barr said was in no way against free speech or against the Constitution. They acted like he was up there talking against the Constitution just because he had his own ideas on religion, ethics etc.
No…they were the ones who didn’t want him to speak.