LOL! Republicans are eternally trying to slash programs to help the poor, who are you kidding “help the poor”. Holy krap.
2 Likes
Financial aid needs to be managed by the donors. If suffering countries don’t want donors to direct the funds they give, they can refuse the aid. As is clear from Puerto Rico’s aid fiasco, giving the money to the wrong people to manage helps a few as a smokescreen for further empowering the oppressors.
Many steps are taken to guarantee just that, right down to people on the ground in country physically inspecting and visiting the areas, but it’s still a very tough job. You are not the first one to have considered just that, give our country a little credit at least.
Even Sanders called out the open borders BS last election before they DNC sat him in the naughty room.
Why the shift? Why would the democrats change to wanting to decriminalize illegal border crossing and give illegals tax payer paid healthcare? We can lol all we want but the left is losing the working man vote even the union votes to the party you just described as ripping them off.
I’m good with the Mother Jones article. Warren speaks with forked tongue.
Do you read Trump’s own words? No. Have you ever looked at his platform? No?
Buy a mirror.
Please prove it. We’ve been giving them aid for years. They didn’t used to show up at the border by the 100s of thousands. Now they do.
We recently cut the aid and now they show up in far greater numbers. Coincidence?
In the very next post you admonished judo for not reading Trump’s platform. Does Mother Jones know her platform better than her?
“We” recently had dem politicians talking about giving them healthcare and sanctuary cities are all the rage and they keep showing up. Coincidence?
Yes. Mother Jones is analyzing her platform. She lies.
Because it wouldn’t stop at the dreamers. Then it would be immediate family. Then distant relatives…
Heh. Sounds about equal to me.
It’s immediate family members now and always has been.
Then why was DAPA shot down in court?
They are here illegally. The family preference in immigration law gives preference to immediate family members to come here legally and gain permanent status and possibly citizenship in the future.
They are not fleeing “from”, they are fleeing “to”.
I read Warren’s plan from your link and then read the Mother Jones article Sneaky linked. I made notes from Warren’s plan as I was reading it and the Mother Jones article hit on most of my concerns. How is the MJ interpretation of Warren’s plan at all misleading? The bullet points and quotes are directly from Warren’s plan and the questions are valid.
Yeah! What Tim said!
Because in the end politics is about power and politicians being able to pump their chests out about their great government programs that little to nothing in actually making things better. In the meantime those in power and their families reap the benefits of being in those positions of power.
