Exactly my point. The law is arbitrary.

Why do you keep repeating the establishment line?

But apparently not with the public perception of what constitutes sex trafficking. Taking a prostitute on a vacation in the Bahamas does not jive with public’s perception of the term.

I understand your confusion. Read it again and parse the sentences. It makes perfect sense.

And I really don’t care if you care or not. This is an open discussion.

I’m not hung up about it, it’s just a fact. The person I responded to said tell it to a Judge. There are other people here besides yourself who still think he should be charged.

For someone who has repeatedly said ā€œnothing to see hereā€ you sure do go on a lot about it. :smirk:

No … In their minds. All 17-yr-olds are not equally mature.

I’m quite certain that the ethics committee will never speak of this again.

Unless is some gay pervert than democrats make laws to allow gay perverts to sexually abuse minors.

2 Likes

I suspect, law enforcement was unaware.

I never even implied he should be charged. The statute of limitations has long since expired. There is nothing to charge.

While you seem to be obsessed with whether Gaetz is guilty in the eyes of the law, I remain focused on the ethics probe. That is what brought Gaetz down.

Huh??? :thinking:

And I really don’t care if you care that I don’t care. :rofl:

I’m responding to you. :wink:

And you know this how? :thinking:

Formally, the probe is done as Gaetz is no longer in the House. However, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the results of the probe leaked.

Educate yourself on the reality of the bill from 2020 please.

https://factcheck.afp.com/california-bill-does-not-decriminalize-pedophilia

And people decide which rich guy wins…democracy. :wink:

1 Like

Then why was the DoJ investigating? Don’t you think they would coordinate with Local and/or State law enforcement?

I didn’t stutter.

But you care enough to keep this going.

1 Like