But the mathematician said they were all 5.5555 and then proceeded to use the binomial theorem to predict the odds of all eleven of them being that exact number, 5.5555, to be astronomically low. That calculation is based on the exact 5.5555 number recurring 11 times.
Never mind that he waded through data to find time increments in each of those precincts that gave him what he was looking for.
I did. The video was about 3 minutes. He wasn’t going to convince anyone in that short of time. I wasn’t because I couldn’t fully understand.
I suggest he put on a longer video with deep dive of explanation. Pretend he is defending a PhD thesis. Share data files. Not a screenshot of excel. Gimme a break!
Fulton County is heavily DEM. Trump only managed to get 26% of the vote there. It is interesting the mathematician picked a small number of precincts with very few voters to make his case. He pointed to a website supposedly showing hundreds more samples. Not surprising, I got page not found when attempting to link to it. And as Borgia points out the samples shown on the OP attachment don’t equal 5.5555. The probability of exactly 5.55555% across samples is pretty remote, but then again, the number of voters in those precincts was very small. With that small number of samples, the 5.55555% might be remote, but the numbers Borgia shows, when rounded to 5.6% aren’t that highly improbable, again given the small number of voters in those precincts and given that the vast majority of them voted for Biden in a Bluer than Blue county.