That is probably correct.
If he had not been part of the Trump campaign it probably would have never leaked out that he was on the payroll of pro-Russian Ukranian interests… which is why he “left” the campaign in the first place.
If someone has committed crimes (in this case, Manafort), should LE look the other way simply because they might have been involved with Trump?
I’d say there is a good chance you’ll get at least one “yes” from one of our infamous board Trump groupies.
Is it administered by the Trump family? 
I think we are learning real fast from the elitist leftists.
Exactly what?
Understanding the justice system is being elitist?
Ok then, stay ignorant
Trump likes you better that way
1 Like
Sounds like it
Leftist elites. Yet you fawn over a billionaire who ■■■■■ on a golden toilet. The CEC has conditioned you lot well.
They’re showing off that darned book learnin’ again.
yeah you guys a fall back on this quite a lot when you are wrong…Education is evil now.
You should get a new playbook
Learning some basics about American jurisprudence?
“I thought he was on house arrest “
He’s holding out for some of those cool Russian mob star tats.
Anyone out on bail, who then goes around to the witnesses of his crime and discusses with them lying when they testify at his trial, will always have his bail revoked. Why do you not understand this?
Is that a problem? See something, say something, amirite?
1 Like
They’re holding job fairs for the White House because no one wants to work for the oranges ■■■■■■■■■■ now.
So you weren’t a fan of the LOCK HER UP chants?
Here’s a simple link for some of the people who can’t even be bothered to watch a decent cop show on TV:
This is the kicker:
A defendant’s bail can be revoked for other reasons, including:
committing a crime while released, even in the absence of a conviction for that crime, and
Phew, that took me 20 seconds to find…
1 Like
They’re either being willfully ignorant or deliberately obtuse. Either way, they’ll never change their minds.
1 Like
