Manafort Sentencing Round II

[Vigilante]

@DougBH

And yet all through this thread we see implications of Trump being somehow implicated, as if this did have something to do with Trump and something to do with collusion.
Mostly, you guys are pretending that this did have something to do with collusion and did have something to do with Trump.

And I would assume that the “No collusion” was an ironic statement about there being real collusion found in the subject of this thread. Things get confusing when you pretend to be speaking for other people, I suppose.

Wonder why Manafort lawyer cane out afterwards and said this judge conceded this proves no collusion when she never even considered it

[Vigilante]

@NebraskaFootball

@DougBH

Personally, I don’t see that employers are responsible for the crimes that temporary employees committed in prior years, especially if they knew nothing about those crimes when hiring.

5th Avenue Syndrome seems to be a real thing. That’s too bad.

Oh, and some of the crimes happened while he was the Campaign Manager, personally, for Donald Trump. Your attempts to minimize and downplay notwithstanding.

As for not knowing the crimes, is this a joke? Even us, here on this forum, were pointing out his criminal past when he was brought on the campaign, and his likely criminal activity continuing. If we anonymous internet warriors could know of his seedy, shady, criminal past, how in the hell do you expect us to believe the man hiring him to run his campaign for President of the United States of America didn’t know? Do you seriously think Trump is THAT stupid? And I’m the one accused of hating Trump.

The work he had done in thd Ukraine and everyone knowing Putin wanted to extend Russia onto the peninsula that Manafort could help Vlad get this done

[DougBH]

If even us on this board can make up one thing after another then why isn’t he guilty. We don’t need no stinkin’ trials.

[DougBH]

Tony Podesta, long time Democrat and brother of the manager of the Hillary campaign was working for exactly the same group of people and was not a registered lobbyist just like Manafort.
Don’t see much outrage here about that.

[Vigilante]

@DougBH

Tony Podesta, long time Democrat and brother of the manager of the Hillary campaign was working for exactly the same group of people and was not a registered lobbyist just like Manafort.
Don’t see much outrage here about that.

What are the consequences Make your case. Why should I care?

[NebraskaFootball]

@DougBH

If even us on this board can make up one thing after another then why isn’t he guilty. We don’t need no stinkin’ trials.

Don’t hurt your back moving those goalposts and carrying all of that water.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@toreyj01

Judge: You have a 35 dollar fine for a parking ticket, please pay on the way out.
Trump: So, no collusion?
Judge: This is a parking ticket. We are not discussing collusion.
Trump: YOU HEARD HER!!! NO COLLUSION!!! WITCH HUNT!!!

Too funny…

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@MidwestIndy

@Orygun

@WuWei

6.5 years total if he does the whole bit?

7.5 not including time already served. But he should get paroled much sooner than that. And likely he would be pardoned even sooner than that.

However, I have a strong feeling that the NY case is ironclad, he can’t be pardoned for those crimes and the dude ain’t gonna leave jail for a long long time.

He had the chance to do so, but he wont die on the sword just like Roger Stone wont. Must be miserable knowing you give up your life for someone who wont do the same.

It’s like some weird mafia code.

[CaughtInTheMiddle]

@Vigilante

@DougBH

And yet all through this thread we see implications of Trump being somehow implicated, as if this did have something to do with Trump and something to do with collusion.
Mostly, you guys are pretending that this did have something to do with collusion and did have something to do with Trump.

And I would assume that the “No collusion” was an ironic statement about there being real collusion found in the subject of this thread. Things get confusing when you pretend to be speaking for other people, I suppose.

Wonder why Manafort lawyer cane out afterwards and said this judge conceded this proves no collusion when she never even considered it

The protestors yelling “Liar” and “She did not say that” were funny.

[wonderingrover]

@Vigilante

@DougBH

And yet all through this thread we see implications of Trump being somehow implicated, as if this did have something to do with Trump and something to do with collusion.
Mostly, you guys are pretending that this did have something to do with collusion and did have something to do with Trump.

And I would assume that the “No collusion” was an ironic statement about there being real collusion found in the subject of this thread. Things get confusing when you pretend to be speaking for other people, I suppose.

Wonder why Manafort lawyer cane out afterwards and said this judge conceded this proves no collusion when she never even considered it

The lawyer heard about all this fake news, and wanted to get some of his own out there.

[Bodecea]

@Apocalypto

Why doesn’t fat donald just address the question with a yes or no answer?

https://twitter.com/acosta/status/1105904035649990657?s=21

Which, of course, is a lie.

[WuWei]

So now we’re counting on the state to correct a central government travesty?

I don’t think he’ll be getting a pardon. I don’t think he’ll even get a commutation.

[Ceasar]

He along with everyone every person associated with Trump is under endless investigation for political reasons.
Nobody could stand up to that amount of scrutiny, eventually they will be broke, or their children threatened to be prosecuted, or they will be caught in a perjury trap.
It’s not right, but the left is so power hungry, they think the ends justifies the means.
When they are done, we will all be less free, if they can do that to the rich & powerful, what can they do to us?
Nobody will be safe with this banana republic type people in control.

[NebraskaFootball]

How dare anyone investigate a band of criminals who have been committing multiple crimes for ages. It’s just not fair. The criminals I like should be left alone. If I vote for these criminals then they should be untouchable. If I like what these criminals say then Law Enforcement should leave them be.

Investigating these criminals means I’m going to lose all of my freedom. Because every time a criminal is investigated we all lose a little bit of our freedom, right? I lost so much freedom when they investigated Gotti. I lost even more freedom when they investigated Scott Peterson. I keep losing more and more freedom every single time that criminals are investigated.

What a terrible foundation this county was built upon where we lose freedom when criminals are exposed for their crimes. Take Manafort for example. So what he profited off of the torture and murder of innocent people. I mean, who hasn’t right? And he gets totally persecuted for that little stuff? He is totally a criminal who freely admitted to tons of crimes but because he worked for a guy I like he should totally be left alone. Now he is going to prison for his crimes and I’m losing my freedom. Where is the fairness???