What is he saying when he said this “too many of the most dangerous cohort in the world”. Is he saying less indoctrinated/feminizing men are less dangerous to society?
Help me out here libs…since you all know lib speak.
I’m pretty sure he is talking about incels. He said something along the lines of, uneducated, depressed men, without a job, and not able to get a woman, are dangerous. Which I agree with, incels are some pretty horrible people.
What this video lacks, is if men are not going to college, what are they doing? Are technical schools counted in their stats? Are they going into a trade? Starting a business? What?
Ha - Scott Galloway is a hoot. He’s a 9 figure tech guy who has had a couple of successful foundings and sales, but also gives famously bad investment advice.
I read a bit ago that an anti-Galloway ETF would have a 150% annualized return over the past ten years.
Also he’s the opposite of an incel so I get the animosity. Total Chad.
Truth be told, I’m seriously starting to wonder even about some of these trade programs.
I’ve a few acquaintances who got everything from electrician to EMT to physicians’ assistant certification, and they haven’t been able to find work in those fields.
Hopefully those men who opt out of college—at least immediately after high school—go straight to work or military service.
I will say this. If young people don’t start choosing trade careers like carpentry,
electrician and plumbing, soon no one is going to know how to do anything.
You are correct. My nephew didn’t go for four years of college but instead concentrated on computer technical courses. He is over 30 today, has a very nice house, goes on vacations with his wife and two children. The dire warnings of that alarmist really aren’t applicable.
Show us the mass of failures of those who didn’t go to college.