So it appears that ole shifty has painted himself into a corner. He claims that he has more than circumstantial evidence of a Trump /Russia conspiracy. If I’m not mistaken, nobody else anywhere in congress is making this claim. Apparently only shifty has such evidence. The senate report says there is no evidence. Shifty also boldly claims that his super secret evidence is more than circumstantial. This means he has direct evidence of such a conspiracy. So when is shifty going to clue us in? When do we get to see his direct evidence? Why is he sitting on it? And what should happen to him when he is exposed as a liar?
I respectfully request that all replies stay within the community guidelines. By that, I mean please refrain from subject changing. Understand, that there are probably 1000 or more existing anti Trump treads in this forum. If you have a Trump comment, please use an existing Trump bashing thread and stay on topic. Thanks in advance.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, but added that “there is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”
So? What’s your point? Are you claiming that he has info that is not contained in the Senate report? He says he does. But we all know he’s lying. You realize that he has access to the report. Right?
Nunes ran the commitee like a clown show and is likely going to be under investigation himself for his involvement in the disappearing inauguration money.
