…And to make money to pay for the keep of those looting NOW and insulting THEM, (the hand that feeds them), the country and the flag. 
Hello…helloooooo, HELLOOOOOO America, when will you realy wake up ???
What does it take…
By definition rioters are not peaceful. You needed that explained to you? 
This issue is rioters are few and far between compared to peaceful protestors.
I would redact one of them
9 Likes
A Massive liar just like his aunt.
0[quote=“Nemesis, post:605, topic:249122, full:true”]
From Grok, interesting reading about how there is no conclusive proof that Pelosis comment is true of false.
There is conflicting information regarding whether former President Donald Trump offered to deploy the National Guard on January 6, 2021, prior to the Capitol riot.
Some sources, including transcripts released by the House Administration Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight, suggest Trump directed senior Pentagon leadership to ensure January 6 was peaceful, including the use of the National Guard. For example, General Mark Milley reportedly confirmed Trump requested “sufficient National Guard or Soldiers” to make the event safe days before January 6. Additionally, a claim exists that Trump requested 10,000 National Guard troops, as noted in congressional records.
However, other sources contradict this narrative. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated that she and others “begged” Trump to send in the National Guard on January 6, implying he did not take proactive action. A post on X also cites former Defense Secretary testimony claiming Trump never gave an order to deploy the National Guard ahead of January 6. Furthermore, an AP report notes Trump’s claims about January 6 have been misleading, though it does not directly address the National Guard issue.
Given the contradictory nature of these accounts, with some alleging Pentagon resistance to Trump’s requests and others claiming no such order was given, the evidence is inconclusive. The narrative appears divided along political lines, and no definitive documentation confirms or refutes the claim beyond dispute. For a clearer picture, primary sources like official orders or communications from that day would be needed, but they are not fully public or universally agreed upon in the provided information.
[/quote]
Grok is fake and does not Grok.
1 Like
No its not fake. Its actually a great research tool. Grok encourages people to dig further into issues.
I like how Grok will summarize a question from different perspectives. As always the question you ask AI is critical.
Well, damn. Look at that. And don’t tell me it’s only one. No one buys the ■■■■ y’all are shoveling.
5 Likes
You do not Grok either.
As time goes on it will prove itself not only a snake oil, fake tool, but a crazy warped tool used by dictators.
It proves the adage, Garbage in, Garbage out.
Of course those who put in the most garbage, will appear to be correct. Here is where Trump and Musk needs to figure out that AI is BS when used this way.
Ask me how I know this?
1 Like
I will play along - how do you know this?
Because the real “intelligence” is already there to “read.”
I can’t tell YOU anyway. “It’s classified.” you don’t have clearance.
lol. they know what they say will be parroted
1 Like
So Newscum give a prime time speech about….
Trump. Not the rioters ripping apart Smell-A.
And still with the “threat to democracy “ bit.
LOL
3 Likes
He got mocked because the audio was off.
Better with no sound…
