Looks like Brennan and company has some explaining to do

[conan]

Then you and I have nothing more to discuss.

[reflechissez]

@DougBH

@JayJay

Still waiting for the explanation as to why if the Obama administration had the apparatus of the state embedded in Trump’s campaign and a compliant willing press ready to spin any story they chose, there was no move made against Trump until AFTER the election.

Indeed, the only “move” made was against HILLARY CLINTON and may have helped swing the election to Trump?

How soon they forget. HuffPo was giving Hillary a 98% chance of winning the election right before the election. They were outraged that 358 or whatever that site was only gave her something like an 85% chance. You don’t thrown a bomb in a situation like that, you sit back and enjoy. And…just as is happening now, if you pull that a lot of people are going to cry foul. No need for a risky play when you know all you have to do is walk it in anyway.

It’s easy to throw stuff like this against the wall because no one expects you to verify any of it.

[JayJay]

Yes because I understand that’s your bar, and that’s how you maintain your bubble reality.

[conan]

And I understand it hard to come to terms to learn just how corrupt a beloved Messiah can be.

[JayJay]

If he was my Messiah…if I looked at political leaders with even a tenth of the religious fervor that would be required to look at political leaders as either a messiah or an antichrist…you might have the merest pale shade of a point.

Alas…

[DougBH]

@reflechissez

@DougBH

@JayJay

Still waiting for the explanation as to why if the Obama administration had the apparatus of the state embedded in Trump’s campaign and a compliant willing press ready to spin any story they chose, there was no move made against Trump until AFTER the election.

Indeed, the only “move” made was against HILLARY CLINTON and may have helped swing the election to Trump?

How soon they forget. HuffPo was giving Hillary a 98% chance of winning the election right before the election. They were outraged that 358 or whatever that site was only gave her something like an 85% chance. You don’t thrown a bomb in a situation like that, you sit back and enjoy. And…just as is happening now, if you pull that a lot of people are going to cry foul. No need for a risky play when you know all you have to do is walk it in anyway.

It’s easy to throw stuff like this against the wall because no one expects you to verify any of it.

HuffPost Forecasts Hillary Clinton Will Win With 323 Electoral Votes

It took about 15 seconds. Learn to use a search engine.

[reflechissez]

That does not address Jayjay’s post. Also, who is the “they” that were outraged?

[DougBH]

Having failed at one snip, you move right along into irrelevancies. If you don’t understand, that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.

[reflechissez]

I didn’t specify which part of your post you couldn’t defend. You posted a link to the ONLY part of your post that you COULD defend. Carry on.

[DougBH]

Nate Silver rages at Huffington Post editor in 14-part tweetstorm

It was 538 and 67% chance to be exact.
The basic argument is of course unchanged and obvious…to most. Really, to just go from post to post saying…you havent proven all that in excruciating detail and I can’t look anything up for myself.

[BigBear]

@DougBH

Since there is currently no illegal activity to which he is accused, apparently your “rational libz” want to pre judg based on their emotions and expose that which they “feel” is there.
Now if you want Mueller to “expose” that which is not illegal,then we have a government entity to do political exposure of one party only and not the other. Sort of what you libs were crying about the hacking being of only one party (though attemps were reportedly made at the RNC).
That is not a legitimate purpose of an agency.

What a great word salad / mush - the incoherence of your words certainly reflects your thinking, as far as I can tell.

[BigBear]

@DougBH

Nate Silver rages at Huffington Post editor in 14-part tweetstorm - POLITICO

It was 538 and 67% chance to be exact.
The basic argument is of course unchanged and obvious…to most. Really, to just go from post to post saying…you havent proven all that in excruciating detail and I can’t look anything up for myself.

The basic argument you were making is changed by the facts, and shown thus to be more of your usual bull ■■■■■ as usual.
Good of you to admit it publicly, sort of.

[DougBH]

In both instances, the only thing missing is your comprehension of the facts and the meaining. Some day you will actually add somtheing to a conversation.
Nahhh

[Bosun]

@NebraskaFootball

I’ve been alive long enough to have a solid grip of reality

I tend to disagree, Bro

[Bosun]

@NebraskaFootball

Still waiting on that link @Bosun. Thanks.

You sound much like an impatient child. What and see. It will all come out in the wash.

[madasheck]

@conan

Libs are unable to admit how corrupt they have become. It is why they must never…and I mean never again regain power.

If they do they will use that to punish those that have supported Trump. That mean working folks of America.

Blathering is not the answer, nor is it anything close to reality. The corruption as evidenced by the indictments and guilty pleas already in the Trump admin. say a lot more than your words, sir. People should not be ignoring the Trump craziness in Washington. It has dangerous consequences for every one of us. I only hope the damage it causes isn’t as great as I fear it could be.

[madasheck]

@conan

You don’t want it to end?

Do you? You seem comfortable with Trump’s vengeful overturning of all the good that Obama did. Maybe some changes needed to be made. But Trump’s complete demolition has no plan to it other than tear down everything. That’s not good for anyone.

[madasheck]

@conan

Because they thought Hillary was going to win. If they thought Trump was sure to win they would have leaked that Trump was under federal investigation.

As for Hillary they had too. NYPD and NYC FBI field office had Weiner emails. And even in IG report Lynch was concern about the leaks coming out of New York.

And Comey clearly stated that he didn’t want to tarnish Clinton presidency if they came out after she was elected.

And if they had leaked the Trump investigation, the right wing would have blown its brains out with conspiracy theories. That alone should be proof that there were NO conspiracies.

[conan]

I see. Then why have some FBI agents been fired, demoted etc if nothing happen?

As for Mueller. His indictment of Manafort was about something over 10 years ago.

Oh the Russians.,how is that working out for you?

Flynn? the agents that interviewed him even said he didn’t lie.

So you have nothing lib. You got that…NOTHING!!!

[conan]

To see your world come crashing down around you…yeah it gives me great pleasure.

I’ll admit that. But that what separate me from you. I’m honest about it.