Looks like Brennan and company has some explaining to do

Did you see where he stated a new LLC last here and got paid $100 grand?

Agreed. And yes we will live through it. But like with Nixon, there will be long term damage done that will take years to overcome.

1 Like

Yep…

Liberals don’t care if the heads of the intelligence agency used their position for political purposes. It is completely uninteresting to them. The providing CNN with the “hook” to release the dossier information says that there was a misuse
Now if the worm ever turns we will hear their yelling.

And, ultimately, it is a Kafkaesque nightmare to have a 2 year investigation without providing the reasons for the investigation in the first place.

1 Like

The reign of political corruption is coming to an end and I am not sorry for the losers. Libs are only interested in power. Trump will probably win the popular vote in 2020.

I’m not sure they realize just who and what they have become…but the American people sure as hell see em for what they are.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You don’t want it to end?

He doesn’t know more than anyone.

He knows more than those who get their news from talk radio instead of reading and listening to the actual source material.

Still waiting for the explanation as to why if the Obama administration had the apparatus of the state embedded in Trump’s campaign and a compliant willing press ready to spin any story they chose, there was no move made against Trump until AFTER the election.

Indeed, the only “move” made was against HILLARY CLINTON and may have helped swing the election to Trump?

1 Like

Because they thought Hillary was going to win. If they thought Trump was sure to win they would have leaked that Trump was under federal investigation.

As for Hillary they had too. NYPD and NYC FBI field office had Weiner emails. And even in IG report Lynch was concern about the leaks coming out of New York.

And Comey clearly stated that he didn’t want to tarnish Clinton presidency if they came out after she was elected.

1 Like

This is a ridiculous argument. Has always been a ridiculous argument.

They had the ability, according to people here, to MAKE SURE Trump didn’t win.

There was zero reason to leave anything to chance.

A powerful Deep State with a willing press at it’s command can’t stop a simple leak in one field office.

Isn’t it always the way with these all-powerful cabals? Like the exhaust port on the Death Star, they always have one critical but easily fixable vulnerability that they just don’t fix for some weird reason…

2 Likes

How soon they forget. HuffPo was giving Hillary a 98% chance of winning the election right before the election. They were outraged that 358 or whatever that site was only gave her something like an 85% chance. You don’t thrown a bomb in a situation like that, you sit back and enjoy. And…just as is happening now, if you pull that a lot of people are going to cry foul. No need for a risky play when you know all you have to do is walk it in anyway.

And if they were so confident in her winning, then why go to all of the alleged trouble? It’s an absurd argument. Lacking any semblance of logic or rationality.

Precisely.

You don’t spy on people you don’t think are a threat.

But it’s the hallmark of conspiracy theories…everything can be explained away.

1 Like

I really should have bought stock in tinfoil when Trump got elected. Who would’ve thought the typical conspiracy theory mentality held by Done would explode so exponentially. :man_facepalming:

Held by some. Ugh. I want edit back!

Is the edit not working? Tell the mods, probably something they can fix in a couple of minutes.

2 Likes

:rofl:

Good call. Should be fixed within the hour.

1 Like