The video they based their fact check on, the link leads to a segment on carry bans in church, not an abortion.
Can you udentify at what point he says this?
The video they based their fact check on, the link leads to a segment on carry bans in church, not an abortion.
Can you udentify at what point he says this?
If you can’t answer them, then neither did he when he brought it up. So your conclusion can’t be accurate because…and I quote, “I don’t know”. We’re going into a territory where all of these questions must be answered so that voters can accurately decide this for themselves.
When I get back to a computer I’ll look.
You should just read what he actually said instead of looking for some kind of gotcha.
I found it. 40m or so. “The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable.”
Delivered
Infant
That is post-birth infanticide.
Meh. They’ll get it worked out on their own. Those politicians actually have to campaign on these issues now.
In the meantime, look at all the little Karen’s whining about things happening in other people’s lands. How virtuous of their fat noses.
Don’t bother, you and Reuters are full of it.
I’m looking at the various ways this can be interpreted and this very discussion alone…should make that clear. It wasn’t and was way too important, being said by a man who too is important…not to be.
Do you think you found the carrot here?
Of course the baby would need to be delivered. It’s at 9 months lol
Of course the baby would need to be delivered. It’s at 9 months lol
And then killed. “Baby”, “infant”, infanticide.
Not zygote, not fetus, not clump of cells, not cancer.
Look at the word *you * used. “Baby”.
PurpnGold:Of course the baby would need to be delivered. It’s at 9 months lol
And then killed. “Baby”, “infant”, infanticide.
Not zygote, not fetus, not clump of cells, not cancer.
Look at the word *you * used. “Baby”.
If the baby will not survive.
The fact that you actually believe anyone would advocate for killing a healthy born baby is ridiculous. You must be smarter than that, right?
WuWei: PurpnGold:Of course the baby would need to be delivered. It’s at 9 months lol
And then killed. “Baby”, “infant”, infanticide.
Not zygote, not fetus, not clump of cells, not cancer.
Look at the word *you * used. “Baby”.
If the baby will not survive.
The fact that you actually believe anyone would advocate for killing a healthy born baby is ridiculous. You must be smarter than that, right?
That’s what the pro-abortion crowd wants, isn’t it? Abortion on demand any time?
PurpnGold: WuWei: PurpnGold:Of course the baby would need to be delivered. It’s at 9 months lol
And then killed. “Baby”, “infant”, infanticide.
Not zygote, not fetus, not clump of cells, not cancer.
Look at the word *you * used. “Baby”.
If the baby will not survive.
The fact that you actually believe anyone would advocate for killing a healthy born baby is ridiculous. You must be smarter than that, right?
That’s what the pro-abortion crowd wants, isn’t it? Abortion on demand any time?
After birth? By definition, that is no longer an abortion.
Listen to his own words.
tnt:There may be a fetus that’s non viable” he said. “
Now…define “non viable”, how much time does someone have to make this determination and who makes that decision?
It’s easy to see which way this could eventually go if defined by leftists. Of course, the decisions to abort would be “for the greater good” of society.
“The parents are Christians?” - non-viable
“The parents are gun owners?” - non-viable
“The parents are non-POC?” - non-viable
Meh. They’ll get it worked out on their own. Those politicians actually have to campaign on these issues now.
In the meantime, look at all the little Karen’s whining about things happening in other people’s lands. How virtuous of their fat noses.
Not to mention, most of these Karens will never even have to make a decision to abort.
The video they based their fact check on, the link leads to a segment on carry bans in church, not an abortion.
Can you udentify at what point he says this?
This article has a vid of the pertinent comments.
Confusing comments by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam have fed a firestorm around the new bill.
If you can’t answer them, then neither did he when he brought it up. So your conclusion can’t be accurate because…and I quote, “I don’t know”. We’re going into a territory where all of these questions must be answered so that voters can accurately decide this for themselves.
Ok.
I’m just telling you, the Gov’s comments were distorted.
As this decision goes across the US, there will be a variance of outcomes but in the end, I believe abortion isn’t going anywhere. It’s here to stay. What will vary is at what point does the procedure become illegal? The first trimester will be what most states will use. I must say though, the former Governor of Virginia’s description of a baby being born and the mother still being given the opportunity to abort the child…is flat out murder. I hope states don’t go there.
I consider one performed in the 1st trimester murder myself. Maybe the repeal of Roe will save some lives anyway. Any lives saved is a huge plus imo.
I’m hearing a lot of abortion clinics have already left red states.
And then killed. “Baby”, “infant”, infanticide.
Not zygote, not fetus, not clump of cells, not cancer.
Look at the word *you * used. “Baby”.
He wasn’t discussing an abortion. That’s the point. That’s the part that was distorted. He was discussing what would happen to the babies with severe deformities if they were not aborted - the rare and terrible circumstances that would require consideration of late term abortions.
Those babies would be born, then they would die.