Don’t know. That’s a good question. But it’s not a good reason to loot and burn out businesses across the nation, is it.

2 Likes

You could be right about that. You’d have to see their policy for exceptions. Could be in some cities where riots are somewhat common, businesses can buy a riot protection rider like one can have added to your homeowners policy for plumbing problems, floods and earthquakes.

I’m sure you could find a policy specific to same but the cost would be prohibitive.

As a rule they are universally excluded under normal policies.

■■■■■■■ hell, liberals supporting this rioting and looting. Why am I not surprised.

3 Likes

You haven’t seen a single post of anyone saying it’s just property?

1 Like

I believe the term insurance companies use for the loophole of exception…or at least in my case, was “terrorism”. I have the option to pay for that but it is an option. I could be wrong but I wouldn’t classify this as terrorism. It was introduced a short time after 9/11 and it was implied at the time of a foreign force, not domestic. It may have changed by now but if so, I’m not aware of that.

And that’s 90% of the “protestors.”

2 Likes

Well in the case yesterday, holding a bible…Which surprisingly didn’t burn his hands.

I haven’t seen one leftist on this forum condemn the rioters or ■■■■■ even support the LEO’s who have to deal with this ■■■■■■■■■

3 Likes

Last night, the President left the Rose Garden and went to St. John’s and held up a Bible. I turned to my wife and said out loud, I do not like this one bit. This is a con and I’m not buying it.

That said, Trump is doing a very good job as President and revealing a lot of wrong doing that should be both exposed and cleaned up. It’s an ugly mess what went on behind the scenes of “justice” that was actually criminal. Those involved need to be severely punished but this whole thing is going to get a lot uglier, before “we” see the light of day again in this country. What was done behind the scenes…was that bad. Judge Emmet Sullivan is an example of what I’m speaking of.

3 Likes

That’ him in general…And what irks me the most is how many people can’t see it and buy into it. Just like I’m sure many bought the con of him going into that church yesterday to “pray”.

Just like my post though that you cut, you yourself con yourself by only seeing what you choose to see, ignoring so much that’s right before your eyes. As you judge the viability of others to judge, don’t over look the man staring back at you in the mirror.

1 Like

Not at all, I just go by his past history, how he’s ripped people off. How he’s talked about those that have gotten in his way of something he wants.
Watch this HBO’s “Real Sports” story on how he was in Scotland. Its only 15 minutes, its how he treated the people and ripped them off there. He’s been the same way his whole life, and his supporters just overlook that.

No my friend. I see it and now I have to ask, which was better…Hillary or Trump? Keep in mind that what I said in my previous post…Hillary was kneck deep in. I don’t know if you can see that yet? So again I ask, which choice was better? I went with Trump and as I said years ago, when I did so…“he’s my personal suppository that I’m shoving up the anus of the US called DC”.

ps…I’m delighted by the results of that choice too. :sunglasses:

They brought it on their selves.

Anybody who is in Washington that long is deep in it…But at least she was competent. Trump is dangerous, unstable and incompetent.

Not sure if you caught the link, might have been editing when you replied…

If that’s your conclusion, I totally disagree with your discernment. IMO her competence was used for evil purposes and it is my hope, she is either prosecuted or vindicated of my belief?

Because a complaint may or may not be valid? Or you know, the democrats in charge don’t like black people, take your pick.

When you believe that the majority of them are hardcore racist that’s the result.