LIVE: TRUMP RALLY 5/6/2022 Greenburg PA with surprises

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

Re affirming someone’s bias for money is the trick.

They didn’t pay to have their bias confirmed, they paid to see a film.

Those are inseparable in this instance. You think those who ran to the theaters to watch fahrenheit 9/11 did so to see the film. Ha! They went to see it because Of their predispositions.

And you claimed at the time they got ripped off?

[zantax]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

Re affirming someone’s bias for money is the trick.

They didn’t pay to have their bias confirmed, they paid to see a film.

Those are inseparable in this instance. You think those who ran to the theaters to watch fahrenheit 9/11 did so to see the film. Ha! They went to see it because Of their predispositions.

And you claimed at the time they got ripped off?

Oh and by the way, I saw it too. And it wasn’t to confirm my bias.

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@sikofit

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

Re affirming someone’s bias for money is the trick.

They didn’t pay to have their bias confirmed, they paid to see a film.

So if a climate alarmist watched Al Gores movie they got ripped off?

Yes of course. The climate alarmist watched it for the sweet sweet feeling inside them making them believe that they are right but they didn’t need to see the movie to believe that they are right. Yet they did. Making the producers money for mo reason other than that that sweet sweet feeling of bias confirmation.

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@sikofit

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

Re affirming someone’s bias for money is the trick.

They didn’t pay to have their bias confirmed, they paid to see a film.

So if a climate alarmist watched Al Gores movie they got ripped off?

Yes of course. The climate alarmist watched it for the sweet sweet feeling inside them making them believe that they are right but they didn’t need to see the movie to believe that they are right. Yet they did. Making the producers money for mo reason other than that that sweet sweet feeling of bias confirmation.

So every documentary is a rip off if you happen to agree with their conclusions?

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

Re affirming someone’s bias for money is the trick.

They didn’t pay to have their bias confirmed, they paid to see a film.

Those are inseparable in this instance. You think those who ran to the theaters to watch fahrenheit 9/11 did so to see the film. Ha! They went to see it because Of their predispositions.

And you claimed at the time they got ripped off?

Nope. I was younger and held some pretty blind hatred level positions about the bush admin. Wasn’t smart but you live you learn.

[sikofit]

@zantax

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

Yeah, we’re definitely screwed then. Hope you’ve got plenty of freedom seeds and nice plot of land away from civil war 2.0!!

Playing with fire.

The idiots still peddling the stolen election lie? I agree

[FreeAndClear]

No. The political ones are

[zantax]

@sikofit

@zantax

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

Yeah, we’re definitely screwed then. Hope you’ve got plenty of freedom seeds and nice plot of land away from civil war 2.0!!

Playing with fire.

The idiots still peddling the stolen election lie? I agree

Which is why you should want their claims investigated and officially debunked. You haven’t won any court cases is a fairly compelling argument no?

[sikofit]

@Piper

@party-free

Why keep drinking bottles of pee from fraudsters who keep selling you bottles of pee and insisting THIS bottle isn’t pee?

Somebody might have and probably did steal the election from me. I’m not going to forget about it. Period.

No, they did not. You are being lied to

[FreeAndClear]

@Piper

@party-free

Why keep drinking bottles of pee from fraudsters who keep selling you bottles of pee and insisting THIS bottle isn’t pee?

Somebody might have and probably did steal the election from me. I’m not going to forget about it. Period.

Thats because somebody told you that that happened. No proof necessary. You believed him because he cna only be failed

[zantax]

@FreeAndClear

@Piper

@party-free

Why keep drinking bottles of pee from fraudsters who keep selling you bottles of pee and insisting THIS bottle isn’t pee?

Somebody might have and probably did steal the election from me. I’m not going to forget about it. Period.

Thats because somebody told you that that happened. No proof necessary. You believed him because he cna only be failed

And you believed it wasn’t stolen long before it was investigated.

[sikofit]

@zantax

@party-free

@zantax

Playing with fire.

Try again

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

When is enough enough?

I don’t agree with your assertion it’s idiotic, not at this point anyway, one way to find out though, investigate.

At what point does it become idiotic? 18 months without credible evidence isn’t enough?

[zantax]

@sikofit

@zantax

@party-free

@zantax

Playing with fire.

Try again

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

When is enough enough?

I don’t agree with your assertion it’s idiotic, not at this point anyway, one way to find out though, investigate.

At what point does it become idiotic? 18 months without credible evidence isn’t enough?

How long did the Meuller investigation run again?

[sikofit]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@Piper

@party-free

Why keep drinking bottles of pee from fraudsters who keep selling you bottles of pee and insisting THIS bottle isn’t pee?

Somebody might have and probably did steal the election from me. I’m not going to forget about it. Period.

Thats because somebody told you that that happened. No proof necessary. You believed him because he cna only be failed

And you believed it wasn’t stolen long before it was investigated.

And multiple investigations, audits and court cases have shown that I was right

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@Piper

@party-free

Why keep drinking bottles of pee from fraudsters who keep selling you bottles of pee and insisting THIS bottle isn’t pee?

Somebody might have and probably did steal the election from me. I’m not going to forget about it. Period.

Thats because somebody told you that that happened. No proof necessary. You believed him because he cna only be failed

And you believed it wasn’t stolen long before it was investigated.

That’s called trying to prove a negative. I also don’t believe that trump is the lizard king though no evidence exists that he isn’t ….

[sikofit]

@zantax

@sikofit

@zantax

@party-free

@zantax

Playing with fire.

Try again

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

When is enough enough?

I don’t agree with your assertion it’s idiotic, not at this point anyway, one way to find out though, investigate.

At what point does it become idiotic? 18 months without credible evidence isn’t enough?

How long did the Meuller investigation run again?

You mean the one Trump started? You were in support of that?

[zantax]

@sikofit

@zantax

@sikofit

@zantax

@party-free

@zantax

Playing with fire.

Try again

@party-free

So we should investigate forever then and continue to entertain every iditoic theory since people accept lies?

When is enough enough?

I don’t agree with your assertion it’s idiotic, not at this point anyway, one way to find out though, investigate.

At what point does it become idiotic? 18 months without credible evidence isn’t enough?

How long did the Meuller investigation run again?

You mean the one Trump started? You were in support of that?

At what point were you saying it was idiotic to continue?

[sikofit]

@zantax

Not finding them doesn’t prove they lied, Saddam was actively trying to get people to believe he did.

Yes it does. Saddam wanting people to believe he had them is not the same thing as having them. Our intelligence agencies knew the truth

[zantax]

@sikofit

@zantax

Not finding them doesn’t prove they lied, Saddam was actively trying to get people to believe he did.

Yes it does. Saddam wanting people to believe he had them is not the same thing as having them. Our intelligence agencies knew the truth

Fact asserted without evidence. Not that I think it isn’t possible mind you.

[sikofit]

@zantax

investigating and finding no foul play is also possible

That’s already been done multiple times. How many investigations will it take?