Lisa Page Sues DOJ and FBI Over Leaks

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@Smyrna

I’m referring to leaks and how those two entities get much of their information. If the leaks are stopped, it helps diminish these entities being used as partisan platforms to inject their agenda.

The Privacy Act doesn’t have anything to do with the vast majority of “leaks”. Most leaks are completely legal.

[H_Arendt]

@BlueTex

@merickson

She’s not suing the papers, she’s suing the DOJ. This won’t effect the papers at all. The paper had no obligation to not print. The DOJ (allegedly) had an obligation to not tell.

Awww… Come on, I want to see the look on the CNN attorneys face when someone sues them for a Privacy Act violation…

You might like to see that, but since the Act applies to those who leak the information and not those who receive or publish it, I think you will have to find some other way to watch CNN being discomforted.

[WuWei]

@H_Arendt

@BlueTex

@merickson

She’s not suing the papers, she’s suing the DOJ. This won’t effect the papers at all. The paper had no obligation to not print. The DOJ (allegedly) had an obligation to not tell.

Awww… Come on, I want to see the look on the CNN attorneys face when someone sues them for a Privacy Act violation…

You might like to see that, but since the Act applies to those who leak the information and not those who receive or publish it, I think you will have to find some other way to watch CNN being discomforted.

So wikileaks is in the clear?

[H_Arendt]

@WuWei

@H_Arendt

@BlueTex

@merickson

She’s not suing the papers, she’s suing the DOJ. This won’t effect the papers at all. The paper had no obligation to not print. The DOJ (allegedly) had an obligation to not tell.

Awww… Come on, I want to see the look on the CNN attorneys face when someone sues them for a Privacy Act violation…

You might like to see that, but since the Act applies to those who leak the information and not those who receive or publish it, I think you will have to find some other way to watch CNN being discomforted.

So wikileaks is in the clear?

As if O.J. Simpson… and every bit as relevant to the matter at hand.

[TommyLucchese]

Normally I would be like, well, there’s no chance this will go anywhere, but after the last couple weeks, the chance that a high ranking appointee used their personal phone or office line to directly leak it seems super high.

[Axxowiz]

This is truth what will they do when he’s gone, celebration at first. I would imagine followed by oh ■■■■■ our ratings.

[WuWei]

@H_Arendt

@WuWei

@H_Arendt

@BlueTex

@merickson

She’s not suing the papers, she’s suing the DOJ. This won’t effect the papers at all. The paper had no obligation to not print. The DOJ (allegedly) had an obligation to not tell.

Awww… Come on, I want to see the look on the CNN attorneys face when someone sues them for a Privacy Act violation…

You might like to see that, but since the Act applies to those who leak the information and not those who receive or publish it, I think you will have to find some other way to watch CNN being discomforted.

So wikileaks is in the clear?

As if O.J. Simpson… and every bit as relevant to the matter at hand.

@H_Arendt

applies to those who leak the information and not those who receive or publish it,

Huh? Are you sure you know what “relevance” means?