You must not have read the end of the report.
Sounds very vague⌠Did the report say specifically what he said and who he said it to?
Adam
187
Both sides arenât equal here. One side is literally quoting the Mueller report listing the times Trump was trying to stop(obstruct) the investigation. And the fact that Mueller made a decision to not rule on obstruction of justice. These are facts. The other side is flat out lying and saying âNo obstruction!â Theyâre not the same.
Adam
188
Yes! Itâs in the report.
She shouldâŚwe dont like criminals for presidentsâŚ
You defend a criminal âŚ
2 Likes
Jezcoe
190
I wonder how the trade deficit compares to 2016.

2 Likes
So the mafia boss told the underbosses to commit a bunch of crimes and the underbosses were smart enough to not commit those crimes.
Trump is who heâs always been.
Law and Order
Peter Smith was contacted by Michael Flynn to find the deleted Hillary e-mails, at fat donaldâs request. No collusion!!!
So is attempted collusion a crime? I forget.
Actually from the pundits and experts Iâve listened to, I believe there is a stronger case to be made that there was no obstruction.
Well, let me know when you find itâŚ
So you can order a hitman to kill someone but if the hitman doesnât follow through itâs not a crime? Has it always been like that?
1 Like
This is not a trade or economy thread.
My point is No Colussion!!
Excast
201
Because every time Trump told one of his underlings to obstruct on his behalf, they either ignored him or told him they couldnât. His intent to obstruct was clear, especially in the firing of Comey.
Yes⌠that was a joke. But, why would we all want to see the erased e-mails. What was Hillary hiding? The way she rigged the DNC,perhapsâŚ
Chris
203
You are confusing Mueller with Comey.