You must not have read the end of the report.

Please enlighten me. :roll_eyes:

Sounds very vague… Did the report say specifically what he said and who he said it to?

Both sides aren’t equal here. One side is literally quoting the Mueller report listing the times Trump was trying to stop(obstruct) the investigation. And the fact that Mueller made a decision to not rule on obstruction of justice. These are facts. The other side is flat out lying and saying “No obstruction!” They’re not the same.

Yes! It’s in the report.

She should…we dont like criminals for presidents…

You defend a criminal …

2 Likes

I wonder how the trade deficit compares to 2016.

trade%20deficit

2 Likes

So the mafia boss told the underbosses to commit a bunch of crimes and the underbosses were smart enough to not commit those crimes.

Trump is who he’s always been.

Law and Order

Peter Smith was contacted by Michael Flynn to find the deleted Hillary e-mails, at fat donald’s request. No collusion!!!

So is attempted collusion a crime? I forget.

Actually from the pundits and experts I’ve listened to, I believe there is a stronger case to be made that there was no obstruction.

Well, let me know when you find it…

So you can order a hitman to kill someone but if the hitman doesn’t follow through it’s not a crime? Has it always been like that?

1 Like

And your point is???

This is not a trade or economy thread.

My point is No Colussion!!

:point_up_2:

GOP 2019

3 Likes

Because every time Trump told one of his underlings to obstruct on his behalf, they either ignored him or told him they couldn’t. His intent to obstruct was clear, especially in the firing of Comey.

Yes… that was a joke. But, why would we all want to see the erased e-mails. What was Hillary hiding? The way she rigged the DNC,perhaps…

You are confusing Mueller with Comey.