Line 5 supplies Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania

[Smyrna]

@toreyj01

From what I have read, the White House is not considering closing down Line 5 but is considering replacing it with something safer, they are studying the matter now.

Do you think they just read my posts and changed their minds?

[Guvnah]

@Smyrna

It appears the line was run under the Mackinac Bridge and I’d have to agree with you. When considering risk/reward, the pipeline IMO should be removed from the great lakes.

Just … removed?

Nothing about replacement?

The controversy wouldn’t exist if there were a replacement pipeline in the works, to be completed before shutting off the old one.

[Smyrna]

@Smyrna

…not to mention, how high would it have to be for the freighters that are constantly traveling through those straights…to clear it? I wonder if somehow it could run just below the cars on the Mackinaw Bridge? That would also help solve what you’re suggesting? They’d have to get around those employees on both sides of the bridge that are there 24 hours a day just to get on the bridge, then climb below it…all without being detected, while cars and trucks are constantly traveling across it.

@Guvnah

Just … removed?

Nothing about replacement?

The controversy wouldn’t exist if there were a replacement pipeline in the works, to be completed before shutting off the old one.

We’re on the same page.

[toreyj01]

@Smyrna

@toreyj01

From what I have read, the White House is not considering closing down Line 5 but is considering replacing it with something safer, they are studying the matter now.

Do you think they just read my posts and changed their minds?

I am sure that’s it, Smyrna, thanks for your service.