Libs, why do you always have to cheat?

[Guilds]

@gooddad409

SC just allowed Virginia to remove them from the rolls.

Yup…SCOTUS allowing Virginia to break the law. In other words, cheating.

[DOLOOP]

@WuWei

He’s wrong. There are a lot of things more un-American than rejecting the results of an election.

I don’t take him literally but I take him seriously.

[WuWei]

Final Arbiters

[LucyLou]

@WuWei

Should have waited.

For what?

[tnt]

@WuWei

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/30/us/politics/supreme-court-virginia-purge-voter-registration.html?origin=serp_auto

You were whinging?

I’ll assume the source is acceptable.

hooray for legislating from the bench, ignoring federal law!

[tnt]

@WuWei

He’s wrong. There are a lot of things more un-American than rejecting the results of an election.

Like what?

[DOLOOP]

@tnt

@WuWei

He’s wrong. There are a lot of things more un-American than rejecting the results of an election.

Like what?

Brie
Cricket
Introducing foreign substances into our precious bodily fluids.

[conan]

@Guilds

Yup…SCOTUS allowing Virginia to break the law. In other words, cheating.

Quit whining.

[Publius]

@Samm

@Publius

@DOLOOP

@Publius

Also, where’d these guys get the backwards American flag patches?

It’s ok to have a backward patch if the intent is to show the object it’s on is moving forward, say, for example, the right arm or the right side of a vehicle. I didn’t see the video so don’t know they’re using it.

That’s not what the Flag Code says.

This is according to the flag code.

Now picture what the flags look like from the other side of the car.

The code places the stars on the pole. The direction of travel determines whether they are on the left or right. The flag patch on the right shoulder of our soldiers assumes they are moving forward.

That’s ridiculous, and it just looks wrong.

[Publius]

@WuWei

Why did you need to add voters a week before the election.

That’s not what’s at issue here.

And VA allows registration right through election day (same day registration).

[Samm]

@Guilds

@gooddad409

SC just allowed Virginia to remove them from the rolls.

Yup…SCOTUS allowing Virginia to break the law. In other words, cheating.

Removing non-citizens from the voter registration rolls is not cheating, it’s crime prevention.

[Samm]

@Publius

@Samm

@Publius

@DOLOOP

@Publius

Also, where’d these guys get the backwards American flag patches?

It’s ok to have a backward patch if the intent is to show the object it’s on is moving forward, say, for example, the right arm or the right side of a vehicle. I didn’t see the video so don’t know they’re using it.

That’s not what the Flag Code says.

This is according to the flag code.

Now picture what the flags look like from the other side of the car.

The code places the stars on the pole. The direction of travel determines whether they are on the left or right. The flag patch on the right shoulder of our soldiers assumes they are moving forward.

That’s ridiculous, and it just looks wrong.

Then don’t look at it from the right side of the car … or from the right side of a soldier.

The fact is, the code does not acknowledge a three-dimensional world. Get over it.

[Guilds]

@conan

Quit whining.

That is hilarious coming from you!

[Guilds]

@Samm

Removing non-citizens from the voter registration rolls is not cheating, it’s crime prevention.

A law was passed in 1994 (or so) that limited the purging/cleaning up of voter rolls close to an election, which is 90 days. The corrupt SCOTUS crapped on that law…to help their #1 client.

[Samm]

@Guilds

@Samm

Removing non-citizens from the voter registration rolls is not cheating, it’s crime prevention.

A law was passed in 1994 (or so) that limited the purging/cleaning up of voter rolls close to an election, which is 90 days. The corrupt SCOTUS crapped on that law…to help their #1 client.

So do you think the law was passed so that non-citizens would have an opportunity to be able to vote?

[conan]

@Guilds

The corrupt SCOTUS crapped on that law…to help their #1 client.

Sounds like more whining.

[SpadeMarlowe]

@gooddad409

@SpadeMarlowe

@gooddad409

@SpadeMarlowe

@coolidge

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/virginia-ag-vows-to-take-noncitizen-voting-case-to-supreme-court-ahead-of-election/

Yeah judges appointed by biden stopped the governor from removing illegals. Seems like a stall effort by democrats to me

It’s a STEAL effort to me.

SC just allowed Virginia to remove them from the rolls.

Wonder what was the ratio of pro vs con at SCOTUS. I am almost sure I can guess how it went.

*6-3 :

Thank you.

[tnt]

@Samm

@Guilds

@gooddad409

SC just allowed Virginia to remove them from the rolls.

Yup…SCOTUS allowing Virginia to break the law. In other words, cheating.

Removing non-citizens from the voter registration rolls is not cheating, it’s crime prevention.

Nullifying federal law is legislating from the bench.

[tnt]

@Guilds

@Samm

Removing non-citizens from the voter registration rolls is not cheating, it’s crime prevention.

A law was passed in 1994 (or so) that limited the purging/cleaning up of voter rolls close to an election, which is 90 days. The corrupt SCOTUS crapped on that law…to help their #1 client.

Judicial activism. Legislating from the bench.

[tnt]

@Samm

@Guilds

A law was passed in 1994 (or so) that limited the purging/cleaning up of voter rolls close to an election, which is 90 days. The corrupt SCOTUS crapped on that law…to help their #1 client.

So do you think the law was passed so that non-citizens would have an opportunity to be able to vote?

No. It was passed to prevent citizens from losing their registration too close to election day.

it was shown that there were many citizens who are eligible to vote in the cache they wiped out.