You people?
My people?
There was one 15-20 minute perfectly legal “opposition research” meeting. No one had a direct line to the Kremlin. 
You used the term ‘you people’ when replying to me.
What did you mean?
I am responding to you in a thread on an Internet forum, if that is enough for you to flatter yourself, go for it. You are important Sixfoot, you really are! 
You libs. Get off your racial high horse with me. lol
Why? Everyone reading the report will see exactly what they want to see.
Bottom line.
No collusion; No obstruction.
Guaranteed that House DEMs will use the Mueller report as a centerpiece of their Impeachment proceedings next year.
This is ripe for conspiracy theories.
I know. People’s lives depend on me. I don’t need any groupies to remind me. 
Speaking of intellectually dishonest
“Prevent us from conclusively”
Translation: we don’t have proof, but we think he’s guilty.
Got anything else?
Never said anything about race.
Broad brushing is a mistake regardless.
I do see it as way to dehumanize people with you might disagree with though. Apparently you have bought into this fallacy.
If the Democrats elect a far left socialist in the primary like Bernie Sanders the “maximum impact” will have fully set in.
29% Sanders
24% Biden
9% Pete Buttigieg
8% Kamala Harris
8% Beto O’Rourke
7% Elizabeth Warren
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/3482387002
So you have no response to my pointing out that you took a quote out of context to make it seem as though it meant EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what it means in context?
Intellectual dishonesty does not mean what you think it means.
So nothing you can compare to the Tea Party rallies of Obama’s early days, some of which were directly sponsored by Fox News.
People are bringing it up NOW because of two reasons:
- Because Republicans spent a lot of time and effort airing their grievances on the economy under Obama
and
- Because Trump said he’d fix it, and fix it fast.
And the data under Obama’s final few years was clear-the deficit was shrinking. We were getting CLOSER to spending without our means as a nation. Trump changed that, but not for the better. He’s going in the opposite direction, which doesn’t align with what he said he would do.
The problem here is accountability. Holding R pols to what they SAID under Obama, and holding R pols, and their supporters, to what they said they would do to get elected in 2016.
Obama’s presidency ended with him making an effort to do that.
Empirically, and objectively, yes, right now one side has massive egg on its face regarding the economy, and it’s not the dems.
Rah-rah-rah! It’s OK when my side (D)oes it because your side sucks!
Laaaaaaaaaaame.
Because it doesn’t actually, despite your claim to the contrary. UNABLE, PREVENTS US Sure doesn’t sound like NO CONCLUSION to me. Words mean things. Remind me what the legal standard for conviction in this country is again though, I’ll wait.
Except that you did with that 90’s throwback response. I appreciate you side-stepping instead of doubling down. Racism is lame.
Dems aren’t my side.
Holding pols accountable for what they say they will do is "my side.’
Fact: The deficit was shrinking under Obama’s final few years as president.
Fact: The debt/deficit are exploding now.
Fact: Republicans, sponsored by Fox, protested out of control spending (debt deficit) when Obama took office.
Fact: Republicans ran on fixing the debt/deficit in 2016.
Prattling on about “sides” seems to be the best distraction you have from talking about the above facts.
I’m consistent on holding pols accountable on both sides. I can see that is something that does not interest you.
1 Like
I’ll take your word for it over your actions and posts then.
It’s someone confusing a movie reference (Tropic Thunder) with reality; that CPU may be a little fried…
