Lets be clear…we see you

[YOSUP]

@WuWei

@YOSUP

@Munimula1

Ooooooo. I’m a-scared.

Oh- and keep in mind that you lost all 3 branches of gov’t and are no threat to me.

Tensions are so bad in the WH that everyone hates Harris, she abuses her staff, and claims doing nothing is actually too much work. You will be losing it all very soon.

Buh… she threw them a party we paid for.

Lol I also heard she’s one heck of an interior decorator but her talents stop there.

[Guilds]

@conan

In some ways it started when Soviet union fallen…and then China entry into WTO 10 years later. That’s when the world become elitist play ground and ignored America.

So Reagan and cons basically blowing up the New Deal in the 80’s, which basically continued into the 2000’s, including Clinton…had nothing to do with it?

[conan]

You mean Reagan is responsible for fall of Soviet Union and new world order?

[Guilds]

@conan

By pushing the new green deal?

When FDR proposed the New Deal…Republicans called him a socialist as well.

[conan]

And he was.

Libs today are far worst.

[JayJay]

@conan

You mean Reagan is responsible for fall of Soviet Union and new world order?

The fall of the Soviet Union was an effect, not a cause.

The overly-excessive deregulation on the flow of capital that started in the 1980s is at the heart of almost every financial difficulty we have faced since.

The “new world order” doesn’t happen without that foundation being laid.

[YOSUP]

@conan

And he was.

Libs today are far worst.

100 years from now, US citizens will be thinking wth we’re we thinking in regards to prioritizing things in our country.

[Guilds]

@conan

You mean Reagan is responsible for fall of Soviet Union and new world order?

We were discussing the economy. Blowing up the New Deal had more to do with the economy becoming more of an oligarchy, then what is/was going on in China or Russia.

[YOSUP]

@Guilds

@conan

You mean Reagan is responsible for fall of Soviet Union and new world order?

We were discussing the economy. Blowing up the New Deal had more to do with the economy becoming more of an oligarchy, then what is/was going on in China or Russia.

In the last 50 years the few have controlled the many economically, regardless of party, politicians pick winners and losers based upon campaign contributions. Lobbyists have destroyed this country.

[Guilds]

@conan

And he was.

Libs today are far worst.

Yes, I know…cons hate the New Deal. They have even created BS stories to try and discredit the multiple successes it fostered. Hell, there are multiple think tanks funded by the ultra wealthy to push that agenda…

Sadly…it worked. You should be happy. The billionaires are in charge. On both sides of the aisle.

[JayJay]

@YOSUP

@Guilds

@conan

You mean Reagan is responsible for fall of Soviet Union and new world order?

We were discussing the economy. Blowing up the New Deal had more to do with the economy becoming more of an oligarchy, then what is/was going on in China or Russia.

In the last 50 years the few have controlled the many economically, regardless of party, politicians pick winners and losers based upon campaign contributions. Lobbyists have destroyed this country.

This is precisely correct.

Oligarchy.

Both D and R.

The oligarchs even seized control of the populist impulse after the 2008 crash and maintain control of it. Truly an amazing accomplishment.

[Guilds]

@YOSUP

In the last 50 years the few have controlled the many economically, regardless of party, politicians pick winners and losers based upon campaign contributions. Lobbyists have destroyed this country.

Do you support those that want to reduce the influence of money on politics?

There are many progressive movements that want to do just that…so congress can represent all of the people, not just the well connected, wealthy ones.

[conan]

Only a political hack would think that.

So fall of Soviet Union and shipping jobs over to China had nothing to do with fall of middle class?

[JayJay]

@conan

Only a political hack would think that.

So fall of Soviet Union and shipping jobs over to China had nothing to do with fall of middle class?

Jobs couldn’t just “be shipped over to China” without the foundation being laid in the 1980s.

[YOSUP]

@Guilds

@YOSUP

In the last 50 years the few have controlled the many economically, regardless of party, politicians pick winners and losers based upon campaign contributions. Lobbyists have destroyed this country.

Do you support those that want to reduce the influence of money on politics?

There are many progressive movements that want to do just that…so congress can represent all of the people, not just the well connected, wealthy ones.

They aren’t genuine about it because they themselves strive to get rich, no politician is really serious about rooting out this issue. Pelosi stands to make millions off legislation about to be passed. Tom Tillis did the same thing. Politicians just move the needle of who is corrupt. First it’s the millionaires, then when they themselves become a millionaire it’s the billionaires who are corrupt. This is a game that will long survive our existence.

[YOSUP]

@JayJay

@conan

Only a political hack would think that.

So fall of Soviet Union and shipping jobs over to China had nothing to do with fall of middle class?

Jobs couldn’t just “be shipped over to China” without the foundation being laid in the 1980s.

The 90s didn’t help either.

[Guilds]

@conan

So fall of Soviet Union and shipping jobs over to China had nothing to do with fall of middle class?

Shipping jobs over to China, is a conservative economic idea. Both democrats and republicans supported that.

Started with Nixon, caught fire with Reagan, W Bush put it on steroids. With the help from conservative, DLC type democrats…including Clinton.

How did the fall of the soviet union effect our economy?

[fallenturtle]

@Jezcoe

@conan

I’m just letting big goverment left-wing radicalized Neo-Marxists know I see them.

Is there one in the room with you right now?

I want to write a parody children’s book about scary Marxists hiding under the bed.

[zantax]

@Guilds

@conan

So fall of Soviet Union and shipping jobs over to China had nothing to do with fall of middle class?

Shipping jobs over to China, is a conservative economic idea. Both democrats and republicans supported that.

Started with Nixon, caught fire with Reagan, W Bush put it on steroids. With the help from conservative, DLC type democrats…including Clinton.

How did the fall of the soviet union effect our economy?

No, it didn’t start with Nixon, Nixon opened talks, Carter opened trade.

[YOSUP]

@fallenturtle

@Jezcoe

@conan

I’m just letting big goverment left-wing radicalized Neo-Marxists know I see them.

Is there one in the room with you right now?

I want to write a parody children’s book about scary Marxists hiding under the bed.

I want to write one about how Donald Trump still lives rent free in the lefts head.