If something kills people that is illegal, and it’s hard to get, by making
that substance that use to be illegal and killed people, and now it would be legal
more people would use it more.
I actually don’t disagree with your statement on its face. How do we fix the problem that so many people are living paycheck to paycheck with so little in savings?
There seems to be a lot of jealousy here. Sanders is not close to being my favorite candidate, but at least he’s trying to propose a solution to income inequality. Trump, not so much.
Sure. I’m jealous of Bernie’s millions but not Trump’s billions? You may want to ease off on the amateur psychology. You’re not that good at it. Just sayin.
Then why does it matter how much Bernie has, if it doesn’t matter how much Trump has? Seems irrelevant to me since both of their objectives are to help the middle class.
I really don’t know, there will always be an underclass, but who would have thought 60%?
I would like to see more manufacturing jobs, not everyone can be a doctor and engineer, also housing is ridiculously high, but the worst imho offender is the price of healthcare.
People going broke in having to have and operation and spend time in a hospital is medieval.
With their hilariously small pay until you get into management.
Best thing one can do is take up a trade. One to two years at a trade school and you can come out making two to three times what the average service sector non-management employee takes in.
You’d think so, because what you say sounds like it makes sense. But it turns out not to be the case. The most obvious example is Prohibition, in which per capita consumption of alcohol AND alcohol-related deaths from cirrhosis and alcohol poisoning actually rose during Prohibition.
I’m not in favor of increased legalization of strong drugs like opiods, coca derivatives, hallucinogenics etc., but not because of an increase in accidental overdoses.