Lawyer issues warning to Congress on Barr contempt: 'You are heading into a world of hurt'

BlueTex · 2019-05-16T17:46:57.076Z

peek-a-boo:

I don’t see that happening. Think about it. If he forces the executive branch to turn over material, you can’t take the material back. Any follow on appeals would be meaningless.

You appear to be unclear on the details of the case. The subpoena is to Mazars, not to Trump or the administration.

The GOP used these same powers to get information from Fusion GPS’s bank in Jan 2018.

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-16T19:19:02.316Z

We will see how this plays out.

zantax · 2019-05-16T19:30:17.533Z

Yeah, the one who thought he could say when congress was in session or not and could murder US citizens without due process. That constitutional law expert.

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-16T19:49:22.614Z

Obama is a self-proclaimed constitutional law expert (a legend in his own mind) . Turley is a widely recognized constitutional law expert.

Vigilante · 2019-05-16T20:26:08.590Z

peek-a-boo:

The key point is this isn’t some magic that would change anything.

DEMs still seem to be under some deluded impression that the new DEM majority in the House can snap their fingers and the Executive branch is compelled to jump when they say jump.

We’ve seen this same kind of pushback from the executive branch to congressional requests and subpoenas throughout history. We are seeing it in this administration and we will see it in the next administration.

Please Dont Stop!! LOL. Did I steal somebody’s opportunity to say that??

BlueTex · 2019-05-20T21:11:04.390Z

The fun starts now…

https://twitter.com/MuellerSheWrote/status/1130580434444623872

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:46:27.246Z

Nothing has changed with the Mazar ruling. The WH will still continue to fight tooth and nail. They will win some and they will lose some.

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:48:41.370Z

My prediction is that leaked one-sided information will hit the MSM within hours of DEMs obtaining the records. The intention was never oversight and the Obama appointed Judge all but conceded that point.

biggestal99 · 2019-05-20T22:50:04.232Z

peek-a-boo:

In this particular case, it sounds like they are likely to lose but plan to proceed anyway. Why would they do that if not for political gain?

The abortion laws passed don’t have a chance to pass constitutionality yet the stupid states are passing them left and right.

Allan

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:51:15.804Z

They are attempting to force the SCOTUS to revisit Roe vs Wade. Were that to happen, my prediction is that Roe vs Wade will stand in a lopsided vote; Something like 8-1 or 7-2.

biggestal99 · 2019-05-20T22:53:12.268Z

peek-a-boo:

They are attempting to force the SCOTUS to revisit Roe vs Wade. Were that to happen, my prediction is that Roe vs Wade will stand.

So why are they even trying, Roberts will never overturn Roe.

No nay never.

Don’t they realize that or are they just pandering to the stupid for votes.

Allan

biggestal99 · 2019-05-20T22:54:19.018Z

Everything now has a political calculation, peek on both sides.

Allan

biggestal99 · 2019-05-20T22:56:04.203Z

peek-a-boo:

Nothing has changed with the Mazar ruling. The WH will still continue to fight tooth and nail. They will win some and they will lose some.

They lost and now will appeal to DC and they will lose there, then It’s up to SCOTUS.

Allan

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:56:27.463Z

I believe Roberts and Kavanaugh will not overturn Roe. Gorsuch maybe. I believe Thomas might be the only reliable vote to overturn.

In the case of the States, I think they believe this might be their best shot. I don’t believe it is for votes, I think it is because they believe they might actually win.

biggestal99 · 2019-05-20T22:57:46.497Z

peek-a-boo:

In the case of the States, I think they believe this might be their best shot. I don’t believe it is for votes, I think it is because they believe they might actually win

They can think anything they want. It’s a loss.

Allan

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:57:51.448Z

Mehta has already allowed the material to be released. Any appeal would be meaningless, as the horse is already out of the barn. It would serve no useful purpose.

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T22:59:04.505Z

biggestal99:

It’s a loss.

One of our rare agreements.

peek-a-boo · 2019-05-20T23:00:45.672Z

Again we have agreement!

BlueTex · 2019-05-20T23:40:39.332Z

peek-a-boo:

Nothing has changed with the Mazar ruling. The WH will still continue to fight tooth and nail. They will win some and they will lose some.

Except the judge didn’t grant the administrations request to stay the order…

BlueTex · 2019-05-20T23:42:18.836Z

biggestal99:

They lost and now will appeal to DC and they will lose there, then It’s up to SCOTUS.

Allan

Appeals courts nor SCOTUS have rejected a congressional subpoena since 1880…