i admire your faith in the “one true system” out of every other thing everywhere that has been corrupted. but no thanks i dont do bets
Camp:
It isn’t over.
She will get Frankened.
i used to call it “trunk ballot democracy” but with these software run machines with people swooping in and “fixing them” those aren’t really needed
W_and_C
November 17, 2022, 11:48pm
24
557 votes would be pretty difficult to make up in one congressional district . State level , possibly.
Here's to feeling good all the time. :
557 votes would be pretty difficult to make up in one congressional district . State level , possibly.
w and c - don’t underestimate these bastards
if this election was consequential enough they’d print them right out live on the evening news because they know it’s too hard to turn it back over
they are master’s level snakes.
thinkingman:
Here's to feeling good all the time. :
557 votes would be pretty difficult to make up in one congressional district . State level , possibly.
w and c - don’t underestimate these bastards
if this election was consequential enough they’d print them right out live on the evening news because they know it’s too hard to turn it back over
they are master’s level snakes.
Relax. Boebert won, that means there was no fraud
1 Like
i’m always relaxed
if boebert “needed” to lose she would have, or will
Right. Republicans either win or get cheated. She’s not going to lose, hence: no fraud.
correction: not enough fraud
keep learning youre getting there!
FlameHeart:
Munimula1:
Probably, but let her squirm for awhile. Let her think about what a close call this was. The question is, will her behavior be chastened, or will she be even worse?
How misogynist.
Really? Explain. In what way? That’s just silly. Do you need the definition of misogynist to get started?
Here's to feeling good all the time. :
This district was redrawn with 2020 redistricting cycle and this make it tougher for a Republican to compete. I don’t see much evidence of shenanigans going on here.
As was done with pretty much every Republican district.
3 Likes
JayJay
November 18, 2022, 12:35am
32
Republican are taking the House.
Looks like several Republicans that “needed” to lose didn’t.
God I hate it when fraudsters ■■■■ up like that.
Especially after I paid good money…
1 Like
Nemesis
November 18, 2022, 12:36am
33
FlameHeart:
Munimula1:
Probably, but let her squirm for awhile. Let her think about what a close call this was. The question is, will her behavior be chastened, or will she be even worse?
How misogynist.
No its not. I love women, my three marriages are testament to that, but I think Boebert is a reprehensible human being. Nothing to do with her gender.
2 Likes
Duh. But what did you expect?
JayJay:
Republican are taking the House.
Looks like several Republicans that “needed” to lose didn’t.
God I hate it when fraudsters ■■■■ up like that.
Especially after I paid good money…
oh my no need to swear judge
you can only scam so much. save it for when it really matters (2024) or for trumpy governors candidates
enki
November 18, 2022, 12:38am
36
no one votes for democrats that’s why they always have to cheat, donchano.
1 Like
W_and_C
November 18, 2022, 12:40am
37
That’s not true. In fact, one of the reasons GOP did well in NY this time was redistricting (Dems’ original map would have been very favorable to the Dems but was struck down by a judge)
For more of a complete picture of what redistricting changed in this cycle:
JayJay
November 18, 2022, 12:41am
38
See? A lot of the GOP gains came from Long Island in California… Two blue states. Yet somehow the fraudsters couldn’t even make it work in states they completely controlled.
Such incompetence!
1 Like
they also implemented curing and harvesting
in a couple places anyway.
Hmmmm… in looking through that link:
California’s independent commission drew a map that threatens a handful of the state’s GOP members. Who benefits: Big boost for Dems
1 Like