Latest news on NYC’s vaccine mandate

Latest news on NYC’s vaccine mandate

December 8, 2021

So, I guess we will find out tomorrow if NYC’s vaccine mandate will recognize the fundamental rights of its residents and apply the protections of “strict scrutiny”, which in this case would require accommodations for those having “natural immunity”, e.g., Anthony Marciano, a police detective on the NYC’s police force for 10 years who has natural immunity, and whose fundamental right to make his own medical decisions and choices would be needlessly and arbitrarily infringed upon by the NYC sweeping vaccine mandate.

Keep in mind, our judicial system has repeatedly confirmed whenever a government action impinges upon a fundamental right, it is presumptively unconstitutional. In Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 the Court noted that the mere chilling of a Constitutional right by a penalty on its exercise is patently unconstitutional.

The bottom line is, under our constitutional system, which is designed to protect individual rights, government objectives and actions cannot be pursued by means that needlessly chill the exercise of basic constitutional rights, and the protection of “strict scrutiny” is there to ensure that such actions and objectives

(A) be narrowly tailored to achieve the government’s purpose,

(B) the purpose must be clearly defined and be based upon scientific and logical reasoning,

(C) and, it must use the least restrictive means to achieve the government’s stated purpose.

JWK

“If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?”___ Justice Story

1 Like

Natural immunity is great. :sunglasses:

4 Likes

Also economical.

2 Likes

…A New York judge

That may be problematic all in itself? :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

1 Like

Having no risk of getting the Qing Qold saved me from 270 miles worth of round trips for nothing. Those miles were better spent on paramotoring. :+1:

4 Likes

Seems the left loves mandates. No thinking for yourself… Period!!!

1 Like

Unfortunately, the Democrat Party Leadership in New York City thinks trampling upon the fundamental rights of NYC residents is also “great”.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their worst nightmare.

1 Like

Fauci is just a salesman…

2 Likes

So why does the New York City Democrat Party Leadership ignore its benefits and want to force those with natural immunity to get the Covid vaccine jab?

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their worst nightmare.

1 Like

We are not making it clear enough to knock it off.

1 Like

SCOTUS says yes to vax mandates.

6-3

Allan

1 Like

:roll_eyes:

Your article has nothing to do with New York City’s mandate and the pending case we are talking about.

JWK

“The mere chilling of a Constitutional right by a penalty on its exercise is patently unconstitutional.” Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618

1 Like

Fauci is a paid propagandist.

JWK

It is absolutely shameful that those in our mainstream media and Hollywood crowd, having achieved fame, fortune and great success under a free market, free enterprise system, now work to destroy that system and impose a notoriously evil, Cuban style government, on America’s future generations.

And ummm crashing??
Lmao

1 Like

Well, biggestal99, I am curious to know why that ruling seems important to you since the majority opinion did not explain its order nor took up the issue of “strict scrutiny”.

Here is a LINK to the ORDER and dissenting opinions.

I suggest you study Justice GORSUCH’s dissenting opinion in which he wrote:

“But even where such overt animus is lacking, laws that impose burdens on religious exercises must still be both neutral toward religion and generally applicable or survive strict scrutiny. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 546 (1993). To meet its burden under strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that its law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Id., at 531–532. Applying these principles to this case, New York’s mandate falters at each step.

Aside from the question why you brought up that ruling, do you have any comments on the Latest news on NYC’s vaccine mandate?

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership, once an advocate for hard working American citizens and their families, is now their worst nightmare.

That one doesn’t count. :rofl:

1 Like

Hate to say it but the NY dumb ass Goofenor and her sidekick, out going NYC mayor Hizzoner DeBlasio, along with the One Horse Dog Faced Pony Soldier residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, District of Confusion, have been gaslighting the American people in denying the reality they face on a daily basis and chalking it up to hysteria and misinformation.

Let’s Go Brandon

1 Like

:rofl:

Ok got ya…

2 Likes

image

4 Likes

It’s a vax mandate.

SCOTUS ruled for it 6-3.

You are correct it is not about this specific case.

But about NYC healthcare workers vax mandate.

Which SCOTUS gave the okay to for now.

Allan