this is an invite. not an insurance policy. what a ridiculous analogy. policy is agreed upon up front by both parties in each case.
heres a non-ridiculous analogy. you decide to invite a friend over to watch the game next week. in meantime friend gets drunk and badmouths your wife (or another friend). you say “apologize or dont bother coming”
did you “cancel” the first invite then send another with “conditions?”
Let me also point out that in his letter, Barr is a bit deceptive.
The first paragraph explains what Barr is upset about - that Cortez said Crenshaw should do something about domestic terrorism.
The second paragraph outlines why Barr is upset - that Crenshaw fought and sacrificed fighting terrorism in Afghanistan.
But Cortez didn’t criticize Crenshaw’s history versus international terrorism, she specifically singled out domestic terrorism - right wing or left wing, antifa, anti-abortion, racisist, blm…you get the idea. Crenshaw’s bona fides against terrorism don’t extend to domestic terrorists like these.
So Barr’s complaint falls apart when examined closely.
if you can show where i am wrong, go right ahead. otherwise convince your fellow lefty AOC defender that nothing supports his OP and then you wont have to bear seeing this thread appearing on your poor computer/phone
these are but a few ways you attempt to salvage an OP that is inherently untrue, by twisting words to make it sound like there was an actual “disinvite”
why dont you just admit that wasnt the right word, and that you dont think the yahoo news op articke was accurate either (because nothing was “rescinded”) and we can move on