So this crime requires intent?
The burden of proof of whether it is a lie or not would be on Kavanaugh.
That’s what I mean by an “uphill battle”.
Defamation isn’t a crime, it’s a tort.
It is only callous if you believe her.
I see. Thanks for pointing that out to me. I’m sure other people will also correct me with less grace than you did.
Understood. I think she’s going to take care of that for him.
She wanted Thursday because she refuses to fly out and has to drive from California to Washington DC. Have to see what other “details” she wants worked out. Hope she doesn’t start driving out for nothing.
So I have a different question: Should anything happen to Feinstein and Schumer and Booker or whoever else for letting the protestors in the hearing?
That’s up to the Senate, they make their own rules.
Good to see she knows her place is subservient to you.
I know that. I’m asking what the people here think. Come on!
I missed that one. I doubt that’s how that “let” thing works.
Ok.
As far as I’m concerned, I couldn’t possibly care less about how the Senate enforces its own rules.
Good Lord. Delete your account.
I’m out of likes so,
1 Like
With her agreeing to testify, Fienstien should immediatly release the full unrecated letter to all members of the committee. It should be marked confidential. If it gets released to the public, an investigation by the FBI should be held, it released to the media person who insists on keeping the name of the congress critter or staffer hidden, they should be complelled in court to reveal the identity. The congress critter or staffer that releases it should be charged to the fullest extent of the law.
1 Like
What?
The letter was published on 9/17
July 30 2018
CONFIDENTIAL
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Dear Senator Feinstein;
I am writing with information relevant in evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court.
As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity to speak.
Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during high school in the early 1980’s. He conducted these acts with the assistance of REDACTED.
Both were one to two years older than me and students at a local private school.
The assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me and four others.
Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help.
Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.
From across the room a very drunken REDACTED said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from “go for it” to “stop.”
At one point when REDACTED jumped onto the bed the weight on me was substantial. The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other. After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom. I locked the bathroom door behind me. Both loudly stumbled down the stair well at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.
I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault. I did see REDACTED once at the REDACTED where he was extremely uncomfortable seeing me.
I have received medical treatment regarding the assault. On July 6 I notified my local government representative to ask them how to proceed with sharing this information . It is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet I felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.
I am available to speak further should you wish to discuss. I am currently REDACTED and will be in REDACTED.
In confidence, REDACTED
The only things redacted are Judge’s name, her name and the city where she lives.
Oh, and she has agreed to testify. I saw it when I copied her letter.
You know what she claimed, why would you ask a rhetorical question like that?
Why are you asking me, it’s you who has minimized one assault over another. Not an argument you can win. Its sad that you’ve tried to assert that one should be overlooked over another to try an excuse one over another, thats on you dude.
She keeps refusing to turn over the unredacted letter to Grassley, despite his repeated requests. He first learned about the accusation from the WP. He’s the Chairman of the Committee.
And of course DiFi sat on this for two months.
Yet she has the stones to accuse Grassley, who has gone out of his way to accomodate them and given many extensions, of abusing his power.
1 Like
